TOPICS
TOPICS
NRC weighs sanctions against VA in prostate cancer treatment errors
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Nov. 17 found the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center in violation of multiple regulations regarding the surgical placement of radiation seeds in the treatment of prostate cancer patients.
The findings resulted from a special inspection NRC conducted at the medical center after a physicist there determined a prostate cancer patient had received an incorrect radiation dose in May 2008. That discovery triggered multiple investigations by NRC and VA, which ultimately identified 98 medical errors out of 116 treatments for 114 veterans at the Philadelphia center between 2002 and 2008.
All the patients were undergoing brachytherapy, a complicated treatment that involves implanting iodine-125 seeds in the prostate to destroy cancer cells. Dozens of patients were found to have seeds erroneously implanted in other organs. VA suspended the center's program in June 2008.
"My professional medical opinion is that the prior brachytherapy program did not remotely meet current medical standards," said Dr. Ronald Goans, the medical consultant NRC hired to examine the records and health outcomes of prostate cancer patients treated at the center.
Goans extensively analyzed the records of 30 patients who were most seriously underdosed or overdosed and found a number experienced symptoms that could be related to the errors, including inflammation and damage to the colon, rectal bleeding and in at least one case, a recurrence of cancer.
In his report to NRC, Goans said the program's past performance "is quite puzzling and shows considerable inconsistency in seed placement."
Brachytherapy at the Philadelphia VA center was performed under a contract with the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and many of the errors were found in surgeries performed by Dr. Gary Kao, a radiation oncologist at the university who played a key role in implementing the center's brachytherapy program in 2002. In June 2008, Kao suspended his clinical practice at the school's request, according Dr. Stephen Hahn, chairman of the university's radiation oncology department, in a statement submitted to the House Veterans' Affairs Committee in July.
The NRC inspection found that the Philadelphia center lacked adequate procedures to ensure patients received treatments according to the physician's prescription and failed to instruct personnel in reporting requirements for medical events. Inspectors also cited the center for incomplete record-keeping and failing to notify NRC no later than the next calendar day after discovery of a medical event.
NRC is considering a range of enforcement actions against the Philadelphia medical center, from a notice of violations to thousands of dollars in fines. Regulators are scheduled to meet with VA officials on Dec. 17 to discuss the issue further. Any enforcement decisions likely will be made early next year, said NRC spokeswoman Viktoria Mitlyng.
Despite the program's shortcomings, Goans praised staff at the center for their efforts to address the problems: "I continue to be impressed with the efforts of the current VA oncology department staff and would not foresee a recurrence of the situation seen in the time frame 2002 to 2008.
COMMENTS
- So what if "John Koper" "recommends" or "doesn't recommend": look at the medical literature and recommendations about even the ethics of prostate cancer screening. It's been many many years now that it has been recommended against, even the DOD and VA long ago removed it from a routine test category. The Standard of Care is not to discuss it unless the patient brings it up and then you should be talking at least 1/2 of those out of doing it. THEN, you have to discuss the pros and cons and make sure you document that you discussed the cons, before you do any testing for prostate cancer. You are at greater risk of malpractice if you DO the testing, etc, than if you don't! j Posted November 24, 2009 10:30 AM
- Depending on your age and the stage of prostate cancer found in a biopsy, I don't recommend doing nothing. I had radical perineal prostectomy (RPP) seven months ago and I'm progressing normally with no side effects. The people who suffer side effects from the seed procedure represent a small number, less than one per cent. The three urologists in the practice I use perform nearly 100 of the RPPs every year. For the last eight years. My doctor is a former Navy doctor and head of Urology at Balboa. John Koper Posted November 20, 2009 4:12 PM
- of course i must confess that i whine all the time and am never happy with the care because all i really want is 100% tax free service connected disability payments. Old JarHead Posted November 20, 2009 2:47 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









