TOPICS
TOPICS
Analysts: Defense industry will survive flatter budgets
Shifting budget priorities and an expected lack of real growth in the Pentagon's procurement accounts will not necessarily devastate the defense industry, analysts told the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday.
For months, many industry watchers have made dire predictions that program cuts in the fiscal 2010 budget, combined with belt-tightening expected in future years, would wreak havoc on defense firms. The companies have benefited from the 60 percent spike in procurement and research and development accounts in the last eight years.
"The industrial base has had a lot of money flowing into it the last 10 years," David Berteau, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the panel on Wednesday. "But the future doesn't look nearly as good."
Other analysts suggested that, while an era of historic growth in the defense budget is coming to an end, the Pentagon will continue to pour billions of dollars annually into developing and procuring weapons and other hardware.
Matthew Goldberg, CBO deputy assistant director, told the panel that many of the programs canceled this year, such as the VH-71 presidential helicopter and the Army's Future Combat Systems, ultimately would be replaced by new ones.
"It's not as though we're going to zero on all the programs that have been cut," Goldberg said.
Stephen Daggett, a defense budget analyst at the Congressional Research Service, conceded that the defense industry would struggle if the defense budget was "frozen" for the next 10 years.
But, he added: "I don't necessarily foresee that happening. Instead, we would look at, if necessary, cuts in the size of the force and certainly increases in the top line [of the budget] to sustain some level of defense acquisition."
With only two types of fighter jets in production for sale to the U.S. military, the industry is "understandably concerned" about its capability to develop combat aircraft, Daggett said. But other segments of the industry, such as the long-struggling shipbuilding sector, do not appear to be harmed by recent budget decisions.
Indeed, the Pentagon's fiscal 2010 budget request moves the Navy toward a smaller number of ship designs, which "could lead to some cooperative effort with the defense industry to improve the efficiency of shipbuilding production and maybe increase numbers [of ships] by doing it that way," Daggett said.
Meanwhile, expected growth in other technological areas aimed at dealing with threats from insurgents and other nonstate enemies -- such as requirements for communications, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance programs -- can help offset losses in other areas, he added.
COMMENTS
- This is great. It's about time. I'm sure there is a lot of waste in other government departments, but the DoD is what I'm familiar with. While I'm a great supporter of the great voluntary service warfighting individuals, there is no accountability in the running of the organization. The senior career military are so corrupt it is a scandal and the senior civil service are almost all like Darleen Druyan, it's all about them. No they don't take bribes on a daily basis, but what about that revolving door. Almost every decision these senior people make are about what position they'll get when they retire with the contractors they give billions to every day. The contractors who supply our material do not need to be efficient or competitive. It's all just a daily activities at the hog trough at taxpayers expense. Let's talk about tightening the belt and effectively and efficiently serving the wargithers who sacrifice every day....not just about the aggrandizement of Generals and senior executives grooming their personal careers. Rogersm Posted November 22, 2009 8:20 AM
- Notice the people whining in this article all represent the defense "industry". There's a big difference between what is needed for national defense and what the military-industrial-congressional complex sells as "national defense". Ike was Right Posted November 19, 2009 3:32 PM
- Thank you Frank. We may need to deter hostile agressives but there is also the problem of leading the world to war instead of good health, plenty of food, housing etc. You get more flies (if you want them) with honey than vinegar I hear. ralph Posted November 19, 2009 1:18 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









