TOPICS
TOPICS
Agencies begin implementing veterans hiring directive
Senior Obama administration officials on Thursday offered details on how agencies will follow up on the president's new directive to boost employment of veterans.
Implementation of the Nov. 9 executive order will begin at Cabinet-level and large independent agencies, said Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry, during a press conference in Washington. But eventually every agency likely will designate a veterans employment liaison, he said.
These officials and OPM will educate former service members on job opportunities, help them determine which openings are the best match for their skills and career goals, and mentor them to help them adjust to the differences between military and civilian culture, said Scott Gould, deputy secretary at the Veterans Affairs Department.
Targeting veterans makes sense, since service members already have demonstrated the talents that make good civil service employees, he noted.
"These are men and women who have fought, who have sacrificed on our part, but have also worked in complex, diverse environments," Gould said. "Their hard-won experience is an asset we can bring to government. We at VA want to compete for our fair share of that veteran talent pool."
Veterans will continue to receive their five and 10 point preference during the hiring process, Berry said, noting the goal of the initiative is "to take almost a headhunting role," rather than to say "here's your five points, here's your 10 points, good luck." Agencies will continue to guide veterans after they are hired, providing them with mentors so they would have a better chance of succeeding in their new jobs.
The Veterans Employment Council established under the executive order will be required to report to the president annually on agencies' progress in hiring veterans. The council has "set no quota," but the objective is to improve annually, Berry said.
Some agencies have set their own targets. Jeffrey Neal, the chief human capital officer at the Homeland Security Department, said Secretary Janet Napolitano is aiming to employ 50,000 veterans by 2012, because there is a natural continuity between service in the military and at DHS.
"When you look at what it takes to secure the homeland, it takes people who are dedicated, who are willing to work very long hours, who are willing to work in uncomfortable, unsafe conditions," Neal said. "How do you define the characteristics we're looking for? Soldier. Sailor. Marine. Coast Guardsman. They have all the characteristics we're looking for in DHS."
COMMENTS
- My husband is a retired Naval Reserve Warrant Officer with over 22 years in the military. He was proud to serve his country. However, thanks to the Veteran's preference, he can't even get a job driving a bus for the government. Apparently there were 4 openings and 6 vets and 1 non-vet, my husband, (because reservists don't count as vets)applied for the position. According to HR, my husband was by far the most qualified applicant for the position, yet they can't hire him because of the 5 point preference. He was laid off for most of the past year. He finally found a position for half of his salary doing a meaningless job, but at least it is better than nothing. Now, when he could better himself and help provide for his family, he is being discriminated against because he is not a veteran. I'm not asking for him to get a preference, just for the government to hire (& allow private industry to hire) the most qualified applicant for the position - veteran, retired reservist veteran, or non-veteran. For a free country, we should be color blind with no veteran preference unless they were permanently injured in battle. Jill Posted February 5, 2010 7:15 PM
- I am a civil servant and see the preselection of nonveterans everyday. Hiring managers hire friends over well qualified veterans. Veterans should join together and do a class action lawsuit for being passed over in the civil service selection process. Title 5 of the U.S. Code, Section 2302(b)(6) which states that no one should "grant any preference or advantage not authorized by law, rule, or regulation to any employee or applicant for employment (including defining the scope or manner of competition or the requirements for any position) for the purpose of improving or injuring the prospects of any particular person for employment." No Justice Posted January 7, 2010 7:54 AM
- I retired from the AF Reserves (No pension til I turn 60)as a First Sergeant. I worked for the same company for 29 years and was laid off in Apr 2009. I've applied for 59 federal jobs with a 5-point veterans preference and extremely good qualifications for the positions I applied for and I can't even get the courtesy of a phone call or email. Where's the justice in that? John W Johnson Posted December 10, 2009 12:18 AM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









