TOPICS
TOPICS
Personnel agency cracks down on appointees 'burrowing' in
The Office of Personnel Management on Thursday announced it will monitor movement of political appointees to career civil service jobs continuously to better protect against politicization of the merit system.
In a memorandum to agency heads, Director John Berry said starting in 2010 all agencies must get OPM's permission before giving current or recent political appointees competitive or nonpolitical excepted service positions. The new policy applies to jobs at all levels. Previously, the personnel agency oversaw such moves only during election years, unless the appointees were transferring to Senior Executive Service positions.
The increased oversight is designed to prevent a practice known as "burrowing in," where agencies allow appointees to remain in government at the end of an administration by giving them career jobs without making them go through a fully competitive application process.
"In light of the historical origins of the civil service system, OPM's role as guardian of the merit system is especially important when a federal agency selects a political appointee for a position in the civil service," Berry wrote in the memo. "While political appointees may not be excluded from consideration for federal jobs because of their political affiliation, they must not be given preference or special advantages."
The new policy defines recent appointee as someone who has held a political job within the past five years. OPM will check the appointments to "ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws."
According to the memo, career senior executives will conduct the reviews to "avoid any hint of political influence."
Max Stier, president and chief executive officer of the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, said he was impressed the administration had the foresight to make this change during its first year. "Typically, this is not an issue that anyone ever thinks about, until election time," he said.
COMMENTS
- sb: Do you even know the definition of the term "Socialism?" I rather doubt it. Wake up, fella, our Nation has had very popular and highly successful social programs that are administered by the federal government for the many, many decades. Some or most of which you most likely gain personal direct benefit. It's merely the misinformed and ignorant voices that want to go back to the apparnet good ol' days of the abysmally failed, chicken-hawk infested, crony capitalist, legacy admit, gentleman c-earning, faux 'bring'em on (for otehr to fight)' cowardly expose an undercover CIA special agent in order to get back at her husband Bush administration. Michael J. Smith, MPA Posted November 13, 2009 1:55 PM
- Sounds like a great plan, if true, sb. We want to purge this government of all bushites. Cindy Posted November 13, 2009 1:03 PM
- I appreciate all the comments, but they are all "inside baseball". The real goal of this is that Obama wants the ablity to purge all appointees (from 5 years back) who might have dissenting opinions in implementing his socialist policies on our nation. This is standard practice for all countries who seek to take-over control. This is all political. Obama wants to retro-actively clear the ranks of anyone who would resist implementing his "re-making of America". Wise up, folks. Look at the broader picture. sb Posted November 12, 2009 8:10 PM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









