TOPICS

Since he arrived at the Office of Personnel Management in April, Director John Berry has been an active advocate for federal charitable giving. The summer-long Feds Feed Families canned food drive collected more than 1 million pounds of goods for food banks nationwide, and Berry is confident that federal employees of all ages also will deliver for the 2009 Combined Federal Campaign, which kicked off in early September and runs through Dec. 15.

"I've always said that feds are big-hearted people," Berry wrote in a Sept. 18 governmentwide memorandum to chief human capital officers. "The CFC is perhaps the best demonstration of this. Giving is its own reward, and that's why federal workers do it."

Since President John F. Kennedy created the CFC in 1961, it has become the largest workplace charity drive in the country and to date boasts more than $6 billion in donations. In the midst of the nation's recession, the 2008 campaign raised a record $276 million for qualifying charities.


RELATED STORIES

"[We're] cautiously optimistic that we can raise as much as we did last year, or maybe even exceed that amount," says Mark Lambert, director of the Combined Federal Campaign at OPM.

CFC campaigns nationwide are continuing to expand their online systems to simplify the donation process. According to OPM officials, $18 million was collected online in 2008, a 70 percent increase from 2007. Now nearly 36,000 employees contribute online. That option eliminates cumbersome pledge card distribution and collection, and confines sensitive personal information to a secure Web site.

Online giving is also a potential recruiting tool to attract younger donors, a target group for the campaign. "Most of our givers are the older generation of employees who are familiar with the CFC and have been giving to the CFC for many years," says Lambert. "Therefore, we do try to target the younger employees because they tend to be your new hires."

A good way to engage young feds is to involve them in the campaign from the get-go, says Larry Hisle, director of the Heartland CFC, which covers parts of Kansas and Missouri. In this region, interns at the General Services Administration participate on the fundraising committee, and Hisle's team attends new hire training sessions to promote the CFC. Campaigns also are turning to social networking sites like Twitter, MySpace, Facebook and LinkedIn in an attempt to reach younger employees outside of work hours. Heartland invites nonprofits on these sites to "friend" the campaign in order to connect with potential donors.

Many CFCs count on kickoffs and special events to generate excitement about giving. The Heartland campaign sponsors a volunteer day that sends nearly 1,300 federal employees to work on projects at 35 area nonprofits, which allows potential donors to witness firsthand how their dollars are used. This year, instead of organizing one large, costly event, smaller regions and individual agencies hosted charity fairs, speakers and luncheons in addition to other activities for the Kansas City-area kickoff week, held in early October.

The Suncoast CFC in Tampa, Fla., holds beach pizza parties and volunteer fairs with guest speakers and door prizes from local civilian merchants. Many of those events are geared toward the growing population of young military recruits at MacDill Air Force Base. "It's fun to see younger people getting excited about it and realizing that a new Air Force member would rather win a PlayStation than a luxury vacation weekend," says Hillary Jollimore, a Suncoast campaign official.

Younger employees can donate their time rather than their money, says Lambert, by raising awareness about the campaign. Similar to workforce succession planning, involving the next generation in promoting the CFC prepares them to donate when they reach higher pay grades and older personnel have retired.

Campaign officials report that the main thing holding back federal employees from giving isn't financial worry; it's that they aren't familiar with the CFC, and no one has approached them asking for a contribution.

"One of the things we try to impress upon local campaigns is that they should have a goal of 100 percent ask," says Lambert. CFC leaders and volunteers at a minimum should get a pledge card to everyone in their region, Lambert says, though some go above and beyond this suggestion. With a 100 percent "quality contact" goal, the Heartland CFC aims to place information in employees' hands and follows up to answer questions. And to maximize potential giving, reminding feds about community engagement throughout the year doesn't hurt.

"The best way you can really grow your campaign in the long run is to make sure the culture of the campaign is year-round," says Hisle. "While you're soliciting only during the fall period, people need to get involved with the charities out there. It's in their minds throughout the year."

COMMENTS

  • The dirty little secret about CFC is the almost 10% that goes into CFC administrative costs (read, promotional materials, rewards, trophies, etc.) and so the donor is only really donating 90% of the funds he/she thinks they are. I have never given to CFC and instead donate directly to the charity so that they receive a full 100% of my donation. The charity has their own overhead and I can't see a reason to pay the CFC an additional 10% on top of that. Naturally, the 10% figure is buried deep into the CFC booklet in very small print. Be warned and be wise!
  • It's sad to see people badmouthing this outstanding program that provides millions of dollars annually to thousands of wonderful human service & welfare organizations based on false, misleading and inaccurate information. CFC is a vehicle to enable individual federal employees to make their own, personal choices about where they want to give, and how they want go give. CFC does not make value judgments about non-profit organization; if they meet the criteria for entry, then legally they must be admitted into the campaign. There is NO allotment or quota that says any charity must receive at least X amount of dollars from CFC. That is a myth. CFC does NOT have allotments or quotas for how much money goes to specific organizations. As long as you designate 100% of your pledge, then your pledge goes to the organization you designate to, and NOWHERE else. CFC, of itself, does not give "aid or comfort" to ANY organization -- YOU and your co-workers do that by the charitable selections you make. Would you refuse to give food to a foodbank because it happens to be located right next to an adult video store? Of course not -- no one is forcing you into the video store. But that's the line of reasoning one commentator has employed to boycott the CFC. I'm not saying CFC is the only way to give, or that it's the best way for everyone -- of course each person is free to make his/her own choices and no one should feel coerced. But please base your decision on facts, not fiction.
  • “I do not give via CFC, never have and never will. I give a reasonable amount to those specific charities that I am interested in. Remember, even though you are told that you can specify where your money goes, it still goes against the amount that was to go to that charity to begin with.” Gary is way off base; and that was an EXCELLENT response, B Jacobs. As a matter of fact, please note the following from the CFC material. “What If I Choose Not To Specify An Organization Or Federation To Receive My CFC Contribution? All funds contributed to the CFC that are not designated to a specific organization or federation will be treated as undesignated funds and distributed to all organizations listed in the CFC Charity List in the same proportion as they received designations. Organizations that do not receive designated dollars cannot receive any portion of the undesignated distribution.” In the common vernacular, if your organization gets no DESIGNATED DOLLARS they receive NO MONEY AT ALL. Additionally, “I refused to give to the CFC as it involves many organizations I oppose on moral grounds” I, too, have found several “charities” I find objectionable. That is why I have several local, low administrative cost organizations that I specify. But I always remember that if I don’t specify them on my form, they MAY NOT get a share in the pot at all! “CFC is organized extortion by the government to its employees.” I wonder how that can be if I have to track down our representatives every year to insure I have an opportunity to contribute. Not to knock our military brethren, but they often don’t think we civilians participate and therefore, don’t ask us. And after some of the comments I’ve seen here, I don’t really blame them. Advocacy groups vs. charities: “curley” you may have a point there but specific contribution designation may draw some of the undesignated funds from those less favorable to your favorite charities. Think about it, if you give more… your groups may get more!