TOPICS
TOPICS
Official: Hill was not informed of other intelligence activities
A senior U.S. intelligence official told House lawmakers on Tuesday that more instances have been uncovered in which intelligence agencies failed to notify Congress about their activities.
Robert Litt, general counsel to the national intelligence director, agreed with lawmakers that the process for congressional notification needs to be improved.
During the public portion of a joint hearing of two House Intelligence subcommittees, Litt disclosed that Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair canvassed the intelligence agencies over the summer to see if they had been meeting their obligations -- and had proper policies in place -- to keep Congress informed of intelligence activities.
No "systemic" problems were discovered, but several instances were found where Congress was not informed about certain activities, which in hindsight should have been brought to the attention of lawmakers, Litt said.
Litt did not provide any details about the activities in his public testimony. Later, he said these were "minor instances."
The instances come on top of the disclosure in June by CIA Director Leon Panetta that Congress had been kept in the dark since 2001 about a covert program to assassinate terrorists abroad.
A spokeswoman for Blair said the instances were self-identified within the intelligence community in an effort to be proactive and to ensure that Congress is kept informed. She said the review was part of Blair's commitment to develop a better relationship with Congress.
After the review, Blair issued a memorandum to intelligence heads on Oct. 13 directing them to use best practices in keeping Congress informed.
The House Intelligence Committee is pursuing an investigation into whether intelligence agencies have broken the law by failing to keep Congress fully and currently informed of their activities.
Intelligence Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairwoman Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., asked Litt who is responsible within the executive branch for keeping Congress notified.
Litt said the primary responsibility rests with each agency's legislative office. But Blair has indicated there should be one person in each agency with that responsibility, Litt said.
Litt said one of the most important measures that could be taken is ensuring that rank-and-file intelligence officers know who that person is and are trained to understand which activities need to be briefed to Congress.
But he added, "It's always going to involve the exercise of judgment."
Intelligence Community Management Subcommittee Chairwoman Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., said she did not understand how the activity that Panetta disclosed in June could have been kept from Congress, given existing statutory requirements for notifying lawmakers. "That case says to me something is really broken," she said.
Litt said there is not a standard practice for what kind of records should be kept from briefings. When asked if there should be, he said, "I think it's definitely something that should be considered whether there should be more formality to that process."
COMMENTS
- So Congress is witch hunting looking for the dirty. Careful cause we all know you are all not saints even Congress. Sometimes when you cant even trust your brother with data you certainly are not going to take it in front of the likes of Congress. This comment is directed to both parties if our fore fathers seen what you people have done to the Bill of Rights they would roll over in their graves. I'm sure the tax laws where like 15,000 volumes back then I'm sure even General Washington kept some things from his echelon because of who he could trust nothing differant today Republicans hate Democrats and Democrats hate Republicans and we wonder why this country is going down with only one flush. You people need to do what is best for America before good Americans have to come to Washington to clean house and get rid of those who speak with folked tongue wiich is pretty much any professional politicians. LC Posted November 2, 2009 3:14 PM
- On an organizational level, I would attribute no more nefarious motivation for these activities than overly enthusiastic support of America’s goals; and, perhaps, certain individuals may overstep their boundaries or take advantage of situations for our or their own profit; financial or otherwise. But standards must be maintained, laws adhered to, and oversight conducted. While I don’t quite agree with Jefferson’s “Every generation needs a new revolution.” I DO believe that we need fresh thinkers who explore outside the box. And, as inevitability will occur, when folks step outside that box we have to have the ability to rein in what may be rogue agents. As always, it is a delicate balance. But I firmly believe there will always be patriots and rough men willing to do what is necessary regardless of the consequences. Just as there is a danger of losing one’s self when going under cover, so must we remind those who go native, to act on our behalf, that they are first and foremost, Americans; and that SHOULD imply a certain lawfulness and righteousness. Tip off Posted October 31, 2009 12:30 PM
- Why should we be surprised that the intelligence agencies are lying to Congress, either directly or through omission? They aren't there to enforce laws, they're there to help the establishment, as represented by the office of the President, to break laws. Alfred Molison Posted October 28, 2009 9:27 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









