TOPICS
TOPICS
Senate sends Agriculture spending bill to Obama
The Senate Thursday sent President Obama the final version of the fiscal 2010 Agriculture Appropriations bill after approving it, 76-22.
Action on the measure comes after the House passed the measure Wednesday, 263-162.
The legislation is the second of the 12 appropriations bills to be sent to Obama for his signature. Last week, Congress sent Obama the $4.6 billion, fiscal 2010 Legislative Branch measure. That bill also included a continuing resolution to fund the government through October, as fiscal 2009 ended Sept. 30.
The Agriculture measure provides $121.1 billion, including $23.3 billion in discretionary spending and $97.8 billion in mandatory programs at the Agriculture Department, FDA, Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Farm Credit Administration.
The $23.3 billion in discretionary funding is an increase of $2.7 billion over fiscal 2009.
The bill includes $350 million in aid to dairy farmers, a one-year extension of child nutrition programs and a provision requiring USDA to proceed with a rule that would allow importation of processed chicken products from China.
"This bill funds a range of programs that help improve the lives of Americans every day," including more resources for food and drug safety, Senate Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Herb Kohl, D-Wis., told his colleagues as he urged passage of the measure on the floor.
Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member Sam Brownback, R-Kan., who also supported the bill, said he hopes next year that appropriators can keep down the cost of the bill.
"I am always looking at ways that we can hold the budget numbers down because I think we've really got to get the budget under control," Brownback said.
His comments came after CBO reported this week the deficit for fiscal 2009 totaled a record $1.4 trillion, a $950 billion increase over fiscal 2008.
Also Thursday, the Senate inched toward completion of the $64.9 billion, fiscal 2010 Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations measure when it defeated, 65-33, a proposal from Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., that spending in the measure be held at fiscal 2009 levels, excluding funding for the 2010 census.
"In this era of record deficits, uncontrolled Washington spending, we are just trying to say `let's live under last year's spending levels,' " Ensign said.
Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations Subcommittee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., said she "vigorously opposed" the proposal.
She said the cut would be devastating to federal law enforcement and other important programs, such as NASA.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Thursday night filed cloture motions on the substitute for the C-J-S bill and the bill itself, setting up votes next Tuesday.
Meanwhile, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., is holding up consideration of the $33.5 billion, fiscal 2010 Energy and Water Appropriations bill because a Senate-adopted Coburn amendment that would require public disclosure of reports from agencies to Congress called for in appropriations bills, excluding sensitive reports on national security and defense, was not included in the final version of the bill.
The amendment was adopted by voice vote in the Senate and was something Coburn considered noncontroversial.
"The only conclusion I can reach is that there is an intentional desire to withhold information from the public and members of Congress who are not members of the Appropriations Committee," he said in a letter to leaders of the Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee.
Reid also filed a cloture motion on the Energy and Water spending bill.
COMMENTS
- Senator Cogurn is right in that such laws are often not open to the public. Gail is correct in that the average farmer has high production costs where expenses have a multiplier affect in the economy. The other important issue also needs to be communicated to the American people for program functions that are part of the farm bill, however, have no real benefit to the American farmer, such as the money in this bill used to buy chicken products from China, and annual funding of the food stamp program. Feedback from the people is an important part of the new administration and the effort to have an open government. jesse mcgaha Posted October 13, 2009 3:16 PM
- One thing I know that would help the economy would to give the farmers more money, because farmer do not hold on to their money received from farming. They spend it all which will help the whole United State recover from the recession. At this time, we don't paid ourselves any salary because we want our business to success. Do the auto CEO stop paying themselves so their business will success? I think not, yet the government gave them big bucks to bail them out. It seems like if you give money to the farmer it would be a bigger boost for our country. I know that in the bible it says we will have people going hungry more and more each year. I guess the farmer can't exceed if that is what is going to happen in the future. I will just have to keep on praying that the Lord watches out for us. The Lord promises are true that he will take care of His own. Gail Walrath Posted October 9, 2009 9:27 PM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









