TOPICS
TOPICS
DHS will discuss realignment of intelligence office
The Homeland Security Department is expected to tell House lawmakers on Thursday that it has realigned its intelligence office, which came under heavy criticism this year for warning in a report that veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan could be recruited and radicalized by right-wing extremists to carry out violent acts.
Changes to the department's Office of Intelligence and Analysis will be the focus of a hearing called by House Homeland Security Intelligence Subcommittee Chairwoman Jane Harman, D-Calif., who also wants to know how the unit's broad goals outlined this year are being implemented.
"Mission statements are only as good as the actions taken to implement them," said Harman, whose panel will hear from Bart Johnson, acting Homeland Security undersecretary for intelligence and analysis.
Johnson and other department officials were called to testify late on Wednesday in a closed hearing before an Intelligence Subcommittee.
Through the realignment, the focus of the intelligence office will be on serving state and local intelligence groups, commonly referred to as fusion centers, a department spokesman said.
Harman said she wants to ensure that the intelligence office is not duplicating the work of other intelligence agencies. "I&A is not a mini-CIA," she said in an interview.
The department's inspector general concluded in a report issued in December that Homeland Security had made improvements in supporting fusion centers, but several problems remained, such as providing them with adequate and timely information and helping them to navigate the department's complex bureaucracy.
Harman said she believes the department is heading in the right direction with its changes to the intelligence office. But she said she wants to learn the department's plan for ensuring timely dissemination of information to fusion centers, especially when it comes to dealing with material that is overly classified.
She also wants to know how the department is facilitating information sharing from the bottom up, or from fusion centers to the federal government.
The IG report also said the department had fallen short in deploying intelligence analysts to the fusion centers. To that end, the department will announce that it plans to provide each of the nation's 72 fusion centers with at least one analyst by October 2010, the Homeland Security spokesman said.
The department so far has sent analysts to 41 centers, along with four regional managers, the spokesman added. It will take another year to cover all the fusion centers due to the process of hiring qualified individuals and giving them security clearances, he added.
COMMENTS
- How in the world could I&A hire to run it's Chief Enterprise Architecture, a low level diagram designer(contractor turned GOVie) who has no knowledge of the BIG picture needed for architecture. Of major oddities is that DODAF is being used with no linkage to FEA. The unit has not provided any usable artifacts to reduce complexity, or add collaboration between organizations. It's like a fish out of water... In the know Posted September 30, 2009 7:46 PM
- I too worked with some of the folks in I&A several years ago and experienced the cronyism; however, that doesn't diminish the need for their overarching mission. From an information/intelligence sharing perspective, they are critical in the feedback loops (up/down) and a potentially vital component of the overall U.S. intel architecture. Just as DHS has been hampered from true intel community participation by the old guard of the intel community, the ODNI has been hampered by their lack of ability to oversee the IC budgets. No budgetary authority = no strategic or tactical ability to shape the environment. It's time the President & Congress realized the need for a true overhaul of the system to knock down the still prevalent barriers, from overclassification of intel to the clearance level debacle to cyber security coordination/control protocols. Many qualified patriots who have tried to help in the national security mission have been dismayed and gone elsewhere due to the frustrations, conflicting priorities and lackluster leadership in various IC agencies. This needs to be fixed and led from the top (President, Congress, Agency Heads). Wolf in Sheep's Clothing Posted September 30, 2009 4:48 PM
- This was inevitable and overdue. Like almost all of DHS, IA became of hive or cronyism and incompetence from the jump. I have personally dealt with some of the sorry hangers on and shmoozers that populated the dank halls of nebraska ave. None of them had a clue and still don't. Anybody with any serious level of competence got ran off by the pigs at the trough. Good riddance - now someone needs to take a hard look at the ODNI, which suffers from the same problem, and the DIA after that. All we need are the classic intel shops and the military and DHS component intel shops under a DCI. And State can huck its NPR Intel outift, too, anything outside of DSS, INL, serves only to get in the way of the real pros. I know whereof I speak. Old Bunny Posted September 28, 2009 5:26 PM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









