TOPICS

Participation in telework rose in 2008, but the percentage of eligible federal employees who took advantage of the alternative work arrangement on a regular basis remained small, according to a report released Wednesday by the Office of Personnel Management.

Last year, 102,900 federal employees worked off-site at least once a month, the report stated. That's an increase of 8,257 employees, or 9 percent, from 2007, when 94,643 employees teleworked regularly. But it is only 8.6 percent of eligible workers and 5.2 percent of all federal employees.

"The report indicates steady albeit very slow progress in telework," OPM Director John Berry wrote in an accompanying message. "We have significant work ahead to develop a strong telework culture."


RELATED STORIES

The majority of teleworkers in 2008 spent at least one day a week away from the office. Thirteen percent worked off-site three times a week or more, 51 percent did so one or two days weekly, and 36 percent telecommuted less than once a week but more than once a month.

Forty-eight of 78 agencies that responded to the survey reported growth in telework from 2007. The report singled out the Health and Human Services, Interior, Transportation and Veterans Affairs departments as agencies that had made substantial strides, and pointed to the Commerce, Defense, Justice and State departments as agencies with large drops in participation.

Among smaller agencies, the Census Bureau multiplied its ranks of teleworkers from 12 to 276 employees. In contrast, the Food and Drug Administration saw its number of teleworkers fall from 891 to 364.

Officials cited office coverage -- or ensuring there were enough people on-site to keep things running -- as the top barrier to telework. Other issues included management resistance, organizational culture, and concerns about cybersecurity and funding.

"The potential benefits of a teleworking workforce are now more important than ever," Berry wrote. "With the cost of gas again on the rise it has become a critical tool in the struggle to balance stretched family budgets; with the threats of new strains of influenza, it provides an effective resource in the face of possible pandemic; as our nation searches for ways to conserve energy, telework provides a valuable asset toward establishing green workplaces."

Talk of telework as an emergency preparation tool heated up this spring with the outbreak of the H1N1 flu. As of last year, 44 of the 78 agencies surveyed, or 56 percent, had fully integrated telework into their continuity of operations planning, the report stated.

"I'm overall pleased to see upward progress," said Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., who has sponsored legislation to increase telework. "We have a long way to go toward achieving what I think ought to be the goal."

Connolly noted the numbers were from 2008 and did not reflect the Obama administration's commitment to telework. He also pointed out the wide variation in participation rates and the fact that some agencies reported substantial decreases in use of the work arrangement.

"That tells me that this was not a serious program," Connolly said. "For a program to work, it's got to be systemic. It's got to have a champion at the top, and resources have to be devoted to it. It's got to be written into the management handbook, so that ... supervisors and employees understand what is expected of them."

COMMENTS

  • The VA resistance to telework was ingrained long before General Shinseki took over and has dug deeper since. The VA believes that everyone should be in your cramped cubicle unlike you are highly favored then telework may be an option. If the situation was really reviewed seriously the VA would find that at least 40% of the employees in the DC area especially would benefit from telework.
  • I've seen both the good, the bad, and the ugly with telework. Speaking on the "good", within DOD, many hard working employees are limited to a day or two of telework. These employees are the producers, the ones I would go to to get a project done on-time, on budget, and with a professional level of quality. No matter where they were, they would always produce the same consistent results. Then there are the bad. These are the ones take advantage of the system every opportunity they get and they can do so because of their spineless supervisors who fear getting a union greviance filed against them more so then teh general morale of their organization/team. The bad ones are never where they should be, you leave voice and emails, and they always have an excuse as to why it took them over 1 hour or more to get back to you. If I was their supervisor, I would yank them off of telework so fast and put them back on a standard tour - 5 days/8 hours a day/ duty tour of 0730-1600 hours to let them know this type of behavior and work ethic will not be tolerated. Then there is the ugly. These are the folks who have gotten caught screwing off when they should have been teleworking. Some of our employees was caught out shopping (i.e. the mall rats as we call them)or were running "errands" during their 30 minute lunch period (which end 2 1/2 hours ago). Or we had one that openly flaunted the fact she could do her laundry while teleworking. The problem was that she lived in an apartment and the laundromat was 2 blocks away! It was all hush hush as it was common knowledge that she was involved romantically with her supervisor, who turned a blind eye to the whole situation. Even the union squahed this one as the employee was a "member". Overall telework "works" when you have responsible employees with a high degree of work ethic who will consistently produce with sustainable results.
  • "the percentage of eligible federal employees.." Where exactly are these eligible employees? As far as I know in DFAS, we aren't even eligible nor is there any kind of telework policy for the rank & file. A very, very small, select group of "special" people have been rumored to be teleworking, but no eligibility for the masses.