TOPICS
TOPICS
GAO: Administration must sustain progress on real property management
Federal agencies are making strides in management of real property, the Government Accountability Office told lawmakers on Wednesday. Nevertheless, the challenges that led real property management to be placed on GAO's high-risk list remain and the new administration must ensure continued progress, the watchdog agency added.
In an update for the House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management, GAO said that in response to an Office of Management and Budget initiative and related executive orders, agencies have established plans for managing real property assets, standardized data and adopted performance measures. According to OMB, the federal government disposed of excess real property valued at $1 billion in fiscal 2008 alone. OMB also reported success in developing a comprehensive database of real property and implementing GAO recommendations to improve the reliability of information in the database.
The Bush administration made enhancing real property management part of the President's Management Agenda. As such, OMB tracked progress at the agency level with a traffic-light-style score card. Ten of the 15 agencies evaluated achieved green status -- the highest possible mark -- for the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Despite this progress, GAO reported that the long-standing problems that led real property management to be placed on its high risk list in 2003 persist.
"As we have reported as part of the high-risk series, the federal real property portfolio largely reflects a business model and the technological and transportation environment of the 1950s," GAO's director of physical infrastructure, Mark Goldstein, said in his statement to the subcommittee. "Many federal real property assets are no longer needed. Others are not effectively aligned with, or responsive to, agencies' changing missions."
An ongoing challenge is ensuring the General Services Administration effectively manages building leases. According to Goldstein's statement, one of the major reasons GAO designated federal real property as a high-risk area was the government's overreliance on costly leasing. GAO has repeatedly reported that building ownership generally costs less than operating leases, especially for long-term space needs. Nevertheless, GSA leased more property than it owned in 2008, a first for the agency.
Other persistent difficulties include unreliable data, underutilized and excess property, repair and maintenance backlogs, and ongoing security challenges agencies face -- particularly the Federal Protective Service, which is charged with overseeing the safety of government buildings.
GAO has said the Bush administration's addition of real property to the PMA and executive orders on real property management provided a good foundation for addressing these long-standing problems.
The agency told lawmakers that OMB is working with administration officials to assess overall real property priorities and establish a roadmap for further action.
"While reforms to date are positive, the new administration and Congress will be challenged to sustain reform momentum and reach consensus on how the ongoing obstacles should be addressed," Goldstein stated.
COMMENTS
- Having worked in three agencies managing Federal real property, I cas say this is baloney. If some agencies have scored highly, it's probably because they know how to play the data game. I'm sure these 10 agencies have indeed "fixed" the specific issues identified by earlier GAO critiques. But on a practical level, nothing has really been fixed. The main problem I found during my Federal career was that the majority of Federal realty specialists are under-trained, under-qualified, and poorly led. Many were miserable failures as private sector Realtors. But they met the minimum experience criteria for low-level Federal realty service. Then they just showed up long enough to gain seniority. Some agencies like DoD have made efforts to address this problem through mandatory credentialing such as under the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA). But the basic education and training requirements of DAWIA were too little and too late. Indeed, in my experience the Navy and Army are among the very worst examples of realty incompetence. The old dogs currently mismanaging the government's valuable assets were simply grandfathered in. Real reform will require at least two substantive (vice data massaging) changes: 1. No one should be managing Federal real property without at least a bachelor's degree in a business-related major (but preferably not without a JD or MBA); and 2. The "realty" brand has been discredited through over-exposure to private sector Realtors whose primary skills seem to include a lot of BS, the ability to drive and talk at the same time, the ability to bake open-house cookies ... and some ability to fill in blanks on pre-printed forms. As a result, most agencies with realty functions seem to view their realty practitioners as being minimally qualified – which may be true enough. But then they extrapolate to behave as though real estate management were minimally important to the agency's "true" mission. Which is like saying that the quality and value of a family's home is minimally important to the success of the family, no? Re-branding from "Realty" to something like "Capital Assets Management" or "Infrastructure Management" -- together with aforementioned raising of the bar qualifications-wise -- might just cause Federal managers to rethink the importance of this work. At least it would be a start. Phillip W. Posted July 18, 2009 11:30 AM
- "GAO has repeatedly reported that building ownership generally costs less than operating leases, especially for long-term space needs. Nevertheless, GSA leased more property than it owned in 2008, a first for the agency." Well, if Congress would change their scoring rules and not require the entire cost of a new building upfront, rather than over its useful life (like a lease) GSA would be able to build more owned property. Congress is ridiculous how it rips on federal agencies for problems they create themselves. Joe Fed Posted July 17, 2009 11:39 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco
