TOPICS
TOPICS
House members ask Obama to bring back labor-management partnerships
Three Democratic lawmakers have asked President Obama to restore a labor-management partnership council established by President Clinton and abolished by President Bush.
"Union leaders with whom we have spoken agree that the labor-management partnership recognized the importance of employees and their employee representatives to smooth collegial decision-making in the government," wrote Reps. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., and Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., in a June 2 letter to the president. "The council served the essential purpose of maintaining communication between the heads of executive agencies and the president to better serve the public."
Clinton created the governmentwide National Partnership Council in a 1993 executive order, and directed agencies to establish their own groups. But Bush shut down the partnerships with a 2001 executive order. In 2007, Rep. Danny Davis, D-Ill., and Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, introduced legislation that would have written the councils into law; the bill did not make it out of committee in either chamber of Congress.
Reviving the labor-management partnerships has been a priority for federal unions, though there has been some disagreement about the form the partnerships should take. John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, has said he would prefer a version of partnership that did not require employee and management representatives to be trained in negotiation tactics that focus on reaching compromises and consensus. Other unions have praised the Clinton-era partnerships for fostering greater collaboration between labor and management, and a number have submitted drafts of a potential executive order.
"Partnership, collaboration, cooperation -- it does not matter what it is called," said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union. "The idea is that a mechanism be established by which employees' voices can be heard in a nonadversarial forum where everyone retains their rights and where the objective is raising and talking through ideas that address ways to reach common goals."
Even absent an executive order, the Obama administration has shown some interest in restoring partnership. Lisa Jackson, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, voluntarily restarted EPA's partnership council. And Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry said during his confirmation hearing that he wanted to increase labor-management collaboration within OPM to set a strong example for the rest of government.
COMMENTS
- If someone would come in here and get rid of the good ol' boy system, they would clean up a lot of the mess. When the big wheels come in and ask management what the problem is, management tell them what they want to hear and not the true facts. If anyone is seeking a job all they have to do is ask daddy or uncle big wheel and they get hired instead of going through they proper channels and getting they job the legal way. Now everyone here is related and they cover eachothers back. This is why the suicide rate has gone up here. We have already had two this year and they had a lot to do with work environment. The union has not power here. If a rep wins their case, they get hired by the other side at a higher grade. Why even pay your dues every week? You can't solve a problem unless you get at the real truth of the problem. Bernadette Kemp Posted June 25, 2009 9:53 AM
- The Clinton era partnerships were co-management and ineffective. Large numbers of employees were assigned to the groups and a lot of money spent for time and travel with little or no results. Most of the time, management still had to proceed with formal negotiations after a lengthy partnership process. Management needs more emphasis on "coaching" employees to success vs. the only-style dictator approach. We don't need Clinton era type partnerships. Sharon Posted June 24, 2009 7:10 AM
- In retrospec to the Bush Era abolished Partnerships. They worked well at DSCP during the Clinton Presidency. During the Bush Presidency, our managment took on a cocky attitude and began to systematicaly break labor law. It seemed the lower level supervisors took their Que from the crass and disrespectfull treatment of the Union during a managment offsite, at which the Union was villafied and asked to leave prematurly. The Union took its lumps, and continued to win case after case at the expense of managment. After all, We still had an Master Labor Agreement, and we were very good at enforcing it. Amen Frank H Posted June 23, 2009 7:48 PM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









