TOPICS
TOPICS
Portion of gender pay gap persists, despite workforce changes
The dramatic shrink in the pay gap between male and female federal employees during the past 20 years is due mostly to changes in the makeup of the workforce, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office. More employees have higher education, for example, fewer work in clerical and blue-collar jobs, and more women hold professional and managerial positions.
But there has been a persistent 7-cent wage gap that can't be explained by demographics, suggesting gender discrimination remains a stubborn problem, according to lawmakers at a Joint Economic Committee hearing on Tuesday, where the report was released.
"The pay gap in the federal workforce that GAO found reflects troubling pay disparity issues in the broader labor market," said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, D-N.Y., who chairs the committee. "Equal pay is not just a women's issue, it's a family issue. The impact of the wage gap is particularly painful in our current economic downturn as families struggle to make ends meet in the face of stagnant wages and job losses."
The study looked at snapshots of the federal workforce in 1988, 1998 and 2007, using employment figures from the Office of Personnel Management. In 1988, women workers earned about 72 cents for every dollar men earned. In 1998, women earned 81 cents for every male dollar. By 2007, that figure had risen to 89 cents.
Much of the difference can be explained by shifts in education, experience and job classification. But taking into account those factors -- as well as race and location -- the study shows that about 7 cents of that gap hasn't budged since 1988, according to the study.
Andrew Sherrill, GAO's director of education, workforce and income security issues, said analysts couldn't explain the gap. "This analysis neither confirms nor disputes the existence of discriminatory factors," he said at the hearing.
In August 2008, a GAO report found that oversight agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs needed to do more to monitor anti-discrimination efforts.
Both reports were in response to a request from the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions to examine pay gaps in the national workforce. The latest study shows the federal gap still appears to be less than the workforce at large.
A GAO study released in 2003 showed that, between 1983 and 2003, women on average earned 44 percent less than men nationwide. At the hearing, witnesses attributed the difference to better anti-discrimination laws in the federal government.
"I would applaud the government for their anti-discrimination efforts," said Randy Albelda, professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts-Boston. But more needs to be done to reduce the gap to zero, she added. In particular, panelists said the government should ensure that contractors follow anti-discrimination laws.
In a related note, President Obama declared Tuesday National Equal Pay Day to advance pay equity across the nation. "I call upon American men and women, and all employers, to acknowledge the injustice of wage discrimination and to commit themselves to equal pay for equal work," he wrote in his proclamation.
COMMENTS
- Erich Darr, If you made men go through the pain of childbirth, the race would have died off long ago! jaybones Posted May 4, 2009 8:01 AM
- Simple fix. Just make men have babies. Erich Darr Posted April 30, 2009 12:17 PM
- It is very easy to see how this happens - especially with NSPS. As a high performer for Army, I have benefited greatly from NSPS. However, in my former job in the Pentagon, I saw the downside-which you would not think would exist. This is a system based on favoritism and cronyism, and I saw first hand the corruption at the hands of a 2 Star general, and no one did anything about it. The good old boy network is alive and well in the form of NSPS and it gives managers carte blanche to hire who they want and pay them more (ie: general officers/retired military officers are hiring retired military officers and former buddies). It is a falacy that those people that do not like NSPS are low performers-employees have been sold a bill of goods and until they are victimized by NSPS, they will not truly know what can happen to empployees under NSPS. Point: I personally know of a situation that occured in the Pentagon, where a career female civilian employee, who had always received exceptional performance appraisals and monetary bonuses-was replaced with a friend and mentor of the general officer (male) in charge. This person had no clue this was happening until she was booted out and into a lesser job. This general advertised the position as needed filling, selected someone while this person was still IN the position, hired his retired military buddy and former mentor, and gave the career employee a lesser position-and he got away with it under NSPS. The person who was in that job had no idea their job was being advertised until after this other person was hired. If it can happen in the Pentagon, believe me, it can happen anywhere (this was at the GS-15 level). Needless to say, that person left the Department and numerous other personnel followed before he could do that to them as well. The person replaced was a disabled veteran. Kathy Posted April 30, 2009 8:13 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









