TOPICS
TOPICS
New OPM chief vows to address pay, hiring and other workplace challenges
Testifying before Congress for the first time as director of the Office of Personnel Management, John Berry described the federal government's personnel systems as Balkanized, incoherent and badly out of date.
"Sometimes, I don't know if my job is like Back to the Future or Groundhog Day," he told the House Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service and the District of Columbia on Wednesday, referring to movies in which the protagonists find themselves stuck in a time warp.
Berry told lawmakers he wanted to promote telework, flexible work hours, and a more standardized pay and benefit system, but he gave mixed signals about pay for performance. Performance-based systems could be useful, but "there are some warning lights," he said.
He noted that within-grade pay raises under the General Schedule could be used to reward performance, but conceded that wouldn't be enough at many agencies. The current pay system often results in different salaries among employees doing similar work, he said, noting that fixing those disparities is on his list of priorities.
Berry also took aim at the federal hiring process, saying it worked in "geological time" and needed to be streamlined. "We need a simple way, in plain English, for people to apply for jobs," he said, noting that he also wanted to use internships to attract more workers and to encourage senior employees to become mentors.
But union leaders at the hearing warned that efforts to simplify hiring could undermine attempts at a fair and open process. "There is no doubt the process could be streamlined without sacrificing those values," said Jacqueline Simon, public policy director for the American Federation of Government Employees. But, she said, the lack of well-staffed human resources offices is one reason the federal hiring process has lagged behind the private sector.
Berry blamed the agency for moving slowly on issues such as diversity and pay parity. "Our score would be laughable in a T-ball game," he said about improvements in minority hiring and promotions.
Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Calif., said the federal retirement system also is in need of updating, noting the current benefit structure gave some employees an incentive to retire early. Berry said he would look at retirement, acknowledging an April 21 Government Accountability Office report outlining deficiencies in the system.
"I think we need to go back to the drawing board," he said, adding OPM's past attempts to modernize the system were too ambitious with too little follow-through. "They were trying to solve everything, and in doing so solved nothing."
COMMENTS
- The largest and most costly problem within the Federal Government is abuse of power from managers and supervisors. Nepotism, Cronyism, monetary and time awards based on who you know and not what you know, verbal and psychological abuse in the workplace are costing taxpayers millions of dollars. If there is seriousness in revamping the government, then start by staffing the "control" positions with professional, mature, responsible individuals whose primary focus is supporting/accomplishing the government's goals. Start by putting "spys" in these agencies and really find out what is going on!!! Where are the investigative reporters when you really need them? Stop looking at ACORN and look into the Federal Agencies wasting millions of dollars!!! Tracy Lawrence Posted October 6, 2009 1:58 PM
- Not to worry, Michelle. Skeeter is just trying to blow smoke up our collective whatever(s), as usual. Annual base salary for the TOTAL Fed was $66,372, plus benefits rated at 40%; that means total AVERAGE compensation WITH total bennies was $92,920.80. For TOTAL minority employment for the Feds, his faulty info actually undercut his point, being 32.1% as of the latest “Fact Book” produced by OPM. He really knows not of what he speaks; which is probably understandable since he is not one of us and gets all his info from Flush and company. Rants from the right often exaggerate the real figures. Still, this was the FIRST time he even tried to point to a particular reference; even if it was an oblique and misconstrued one to GovExec. (Okay, I’m TRYING not to call him a … fabricator of fact.) Tip off Posted May 11, 2009 1:20 PM
- Good intention of pay for performance got lost on day one. The way it got advertised in power point presentation throughout the chain of command gave it a robust win win situation for employees who presented those presentation. There is no monitoring of those presentation and now we the employees with 20 to 30 years of experience got stuck with it. Help us to getout of it as fast as you can sir! DoD worker Posted April 30, 2009 11:06 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









