TOPICS

The Internal Revenue Service must improve how it monitors frozen tax refunds to prevent individuals from fraudulently receiving refunds and payments from the 2008 stimulus, according to a new report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

As part of the 2008 economic stimulus signed by President Bush last year, the IRS distributed more than 119 million payments to taxpayers totaling $96.3 billion. The IG investigated the success of the agency's criminal investigation division in preventing individuals who claimed false refunds on their tax returns from receiving stimulus payments, and found that a fraction of the total $96.3 billion -- $1.2 million -- were false stimulus payments. The review, however, also showed that the IRS paid $16.3 million in false annual refunds during that period.

The watchdog expressed particular concern over the IRS' ability to track annual refunds the agency has frozen for review. According to the report, the process for restricting taxpayer refund accounts is complex and confusing, and processing delays and systemic deficiencies have caused temporary freezes to be released improperly.


RELATED STORIES

The IG estimated that if the IRS criminal investigation division did not take steps to monitor its false refund inventory adequately and ensure cases are reviewed for resolution before their temporary freeze expired, about $117.6 million in false refunds could be released during the next five years.

Additionally, the IRS is at risk of releasing more than $138 million in payments under the 2008 stimulus to individuals who file phony returns. Individuals who reclaim stimulus payments not issued in 2008 due to fraudulent returns during the 2009 season will have their refunds reviewed.

"We believe this high volume of returns, coupled with limited resources and other competing priorities, could cause the IRS to increase the dollar tolerance of the potentially false stimulus payments referred to examination function personnel," the report stated. "As a result, there is an increased risk that some of these stimulus payments could be issued."

In response to the report, Eileen Mayer, head of the criminal investigation division, disagreed with both the tone and statistics of the inspector general. Mayer said she appreciated the IG's acknowledgement that the error rate for 2008 stimulus payment was small, but "the overall tone of the report does not provide the reader with the significant efforts [the unit] has taken to reduce fraudulent refunds from being issued."

During the last two filing seasons, the IRS prevented more than $2 billion in false refunds from being distributed, Mayer wrote. She took issue with the inspector general's estimate that $117.6 million in false refunds could be released in the coming years, calling the methodology used "biased in its assumptions." According to Mayer, the watchdog did not account for any volume changes in returns, average refund amounts, processing improvements or future economic conditions when calculating the estimate.

COMMENTS

  • Guess this! 2 male Hispanics have been working and then getting home loans, vehicles, credit cards, driver's licenses, and even have their OWN credit reports using their own names but my husband's SSN. We did obtain these Hispanic's IRS earnings statements from 1998 to 2006. Every year the IRS records state that they are using an "invalid" SSN. We only found out this was happening because a collection agency was trying to collect a debt from my husband that one of these Hispanics made. We don't even think these men are legal citizens. The IRS told us that Federal law prevents them from notifying the American taxpayer when someone is fraudulently using YOUR SSN. I guess the criminals have more civil rights and privacy rights than we do. The IRS didn't think we should have been able to get the IRS records of these men. Even though we may of had to pay the income taxes on these men's "under-reported" income. The IRS does not even investigate anyone who works fraudulently with your SSN and the employer keeps putting YOUR SSN on their W2. Then they can use their W2 of proof of income and get credit with YOUR SSN. google Robert Guenterberg and read out story. Not only should the the IRS do more to prevent fraudulent refunds (one of these HIspanics and his wife got refunds using my husband's SSN) but they should make sure and penalize employers who keep putting no match name/SSN on the crooks W2. I guess we are suppose to "share" our SSN numbers with illegal aliens now too.
  • How about cramping down on those people that do NOT pay their income taxes - like Marion Barry of Washington, DC, the former mayor and now councilman. He owes more than $277,000 in back taxes over a number of years. If he was a "regular person" the IRS would have come charging after him for a couple of bucks!
  • This year was the first year my 18 year old daughter had to file a tax return. She worked two part time jobs over the summer and one durring the school year. However, when she filed it online it was rejected because of a Social Security Number issue. She has been listed on our tax forms as being tied to that Social Security Number since the IRS required childrens numbers and we have lived at the same addres for more then 15 years. Even though the manual return will probably put her behind illegal and recently arrived aliens for student aide (she's going to be a college freshman)I hope that some fraud action is taken against whomever is found to have used her number.