TOPICS
TOPICS
Energy staffing hasn't kept pace with acquisition workload, IG says
A recent increase in hiring contract specialists at the Energy Department has done little to offset a growing demand for their skills and meet the unprecedented requirements of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, according to a special report by the department's inspector general.
Energy is responsible for about $40 billion in Recovery Act funds. In February, Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced plans to expedite stimulus spending at the department, citing a sense of urgency created by rising unemployment.
But the latest report in a series of recent audits by Inspector General Gregory Friedman casts doubt on the department's ability to adequately manage those funds along with an already overwhelming acquisition workload.
Previous IG audits found that between 1998 and 2006, the dollar value, impact and complexity of Energy's procurement efforts increased nearly 50 percent while the overall number of contract specialists decreased slightly during the same period.
In the most recent report, Friedman found that since September 2007, Energy had boosted the number of contract specialists at the department by 20 percent, to 522, mostly at the National Nuclear Security Administration.
While those gains represent important progress in expanding the department's ability to oversee contracts adequately, they will do little to address the looming requirements related to all the contracts and loan guarantees expected to be let under the Recovery Act. That's because NNSA, which is responsible for managing nuclear weapons, nonproliferation and the naval reactor programs, isn't likely to see any program expansion under the economic stimulus plan.
"From our perspective, the overall increase in personnel was an incremental improvement from 2006," Friedman wrote. "As was the case at the time of our original review, procurement obligations within the department have continued to rise steadily in recent years, increasing demands on the procurement workforce."
"Recent progress in adding contact specialists notwithstanding, from 1998 to 2008, department procurement obligations increased approximately 61 percent, while the number of contract specialists increased only 20 percent," the report said.
What's more, annual attrition rates of contract specialists exceed 9 percent when retirement and other factors are considered, auditors found. In 2008, nearly 20 percent of the department's contract specialists were eligible to retire. Should they all decide to exercise their retirement options, the already high attrition rate would skyrocket in the near future.
Energy has taken a number of steps to recruit and retain contract specialists, including exercising special authority to rehire former employees who can return to federal service without losing pension benefits. Nonetheless, procurement officials told auditors on the IG's staff that recruiting sufficient personnel remains a significant challenge.
Concerns about the size and adequacy of the acquisition workforce aren't limited to Energy. On March 4, President Obama issued a memorandum to all federal agencies outlining a number of steps they should be taking to address shortcomings in government contracting operations, including the size and capability of the workforce.
"The federal government must have sufficient capacity to manage and oversee the contracting process from start to finish so as to ensure that taxpayer funds are spent wisely and are not subject to excessive risk," Obama said in the memo.
The president directed the Office of Management and Budget to develop governmentwide guidance to ensure appropriate management and oversight of acquisitions by Sept. 30.
COMMENTS
- The federal government cannot keep skilled and trained Contracting Officers and Contract Specialist because far too often the "good ones" are overworked, underpaid, have low morale, know that there is limited promotion potential in their field, and not given adaquate time to obtain/maintain their training proficiencies. It takes some time to become a good acquisition professional or contract monitor (PM, TM, COR, COTR) but too often individuals appointed in these positions are not trained or fully understand their role within the acquisition workforce. DAU offers excellent training (online and classroom; and need to offer more online level I and II courses) but nothing takes the place of on-the-job training and mentoring; this will not happen when work conditions keep sending people to the exits of a revolving door. I've seen far too many people who don't understand government contracting, but think they do, and approach it as if they were doing business for themselves; without any regard (or concern) about the rules, laws, restrictions, or potential consequences of their actions. If the government wants to attract and retain good acquisition professionals and contract monitors then the government needs to do a better job in selection, training, starting salaries (grades) and promotion opportunities. Also, CORs, COTRs, and Contract Monitors should have a professional series number or an additional skill identifier (ASI), instead of just being an additional duty assignment. G. Louise Posted April 9, 2009 8:49 AM
- Any whose fault is this? I would bet that energy's budget was cut, cut, cut - and now GAO comes in and tells them everything they are doing wrong. Congress takes a lot of the blame. Kathy Posted April 6, 2009 10:10 AM
- The idea that there can be new staff, trained and in place to make a difference in obligating ARRA funds is laughable at best and delusional in reality. The fact that folks have to seek direct hire authority speaks tons about the broken system of federal hiring. Part of the problem is Congress, part is implementation of Title V. Congress should relax the requirements of Clinger Cohen (or AWIA or whatever they call it these days) and let entry level people compete with any type of BA/BS degree whether or not they have had any business courses. Put the business acumen requirements on folks AFTER they get hired, and enforce them,don't require everybody to be beancounters before they can get in the door; what you lean in college has little relevancy to the federal government anyway; most senior procurement professional I know including myself, would not have been hired under today's rules, and we are the people everyone is crying to keep. Everyone needs to wake up if we're going to fix this problem. oldson Posted April 2, 2009 4:26 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









