TOPICS
TOPICS
FAA nominee draws praise for union and management experience
Employee and industry groups have expressed support for Randy Babbitt, President Obama's choice to head the Federal Aviation Administration.
An aviation consultant and former head of the Airline Pilots Association (ALPA), Babbitt has worked for unions and company management -- experience that has won him the trust of both employee groups and management organizations.
"The FAA needs a leader who is respected by all elements of the aviation industry and who understands the critical importance of front-line aviation workers," said Edward Wytkind, president of the transportation trades division of the AFL-CIO. "Randy Babbitt's nomination answers this call."
Babbitt began his career as a pilot for Eastern Airlines and later became chief executive officer of ALPA, before leaving to create his own consulting company. Babbitt is currently a partner at international management consulting firm Oliver Wyman, where he specializes in advising airlines and workers' unions during restructurings and mergers.
His experience also includes working with FAA on a number of issues. During the George W. Bush administration, Babbitt served on the FAA Management Advisory Council, which helps the agency's administrator make decisions about policy, regulatory and budgetary issues. In addition, he was a member of a 2008 commission that examined how to foster a stronger culture of safety within FAA.
Former FAA Administrator Marion Blakey, now president of the Aerospace Industries Association, said Babbitt's varied perspectives as a pilot, union leader and management consultant make him uniquely well-equipped to tackle the agency's significant challenges.
Toward the end of Blakey's tenure, the agency awarded an 18-year, $1.8 billion contract to ITT to develop a GPS-based air traffic control system, known as NextGen, to replace the radar-based system. Babbitt's five-year term means he will supervise the initial delivery of the new system, due in 2010, and its nationwide rollout, which is scheduled for completion by 2013.
But NextGen is only one major issue Babbitt will face if confirmed as administrator. FAA's authorizing legislation expired on Sept. 30, 2007, and disagreements in the House and Senate about how to change its funding structure have stalled reauthorization bills in Congress. FAA has been operating on temporary extensions of its authorizing legislation since its expiration, keeping the agency's funding frozen at 2007 levels.
FAA's annual budget has been a major concern for aviation industry groups, which are seeking to modernize airports and runways to keep up with new security requirements and meet increasing demands for air travel.
Greg Principato, president of Airports Council International-North America, one of the groups that has expressed concern over the budget, said he had worked with Babbitt for many years and was confident Babbitt would help address funding shortfalls.
FAA also has faced serious rifts in recent years between management and some segments of its workforce. In particular, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association has protested against pay and work rules which Blakey imposed in 2007 after negotiations between the agency and the union reached an impasse. The FAA administrator now has the authority to impose the agency's final contract offer on a union if negotiations break down. The union has fought to insert language into reauthorization legislation that would require arbitration if discussions fail.
NATCA President Pat Forrey said he was concerned about Babbitt's membership on the FAA Management Advisory Council during the 2007 contract negotiations, but that the union was prepared to give the nominee the benefit of the doubt because of Obama's support for NATCA. As a senator, Obama introduced legislation in 2006 that would prevent FAA from imposing pay and work rules on its employees, but the Senate never voted on the bill.
"Our focus right now is putting an end to those problems and looking forward," Forrey said. "We have placed our trust and confidence in President Obama."
COMMENTS
- NATCA is a joke. Yes, what the FAA did to the Air Traffic Controllers stinks. But NATCA allowed it to happen. And now they have dug themselves so far into a hole they've forgotten what it's like to be out of it. They need to get over themselves. The only ones trying to bust the union is the union themselves! They are imploding. They are turning on their own, and intentionally sabotaging any progress in order to continue to justify their whining and complaining. Times are tough, and we all are working under "imposed" conditions... but we go on. Stressful jobs... yes, absolutely. I don't begrudge you that. I do believe, however, that your compensation is adequate. But whoever said firemen and cops make far less is way off. Cops around here make six figures easily! And their base pay is about the same as a newly hired ATC. Amazed onlooker Posted April 24, 2009 9:28 AM
- Dan, just a couple of things for you...First, take a look at the other non-governmental contracted air traffic control systems across the globe and you will see tremendous problems and dissatisfaction within the workforce and from the users. Controller retention is difficult, pay is low as well. (How many people would want the stress of ATC when they can work as a teller at a bank, or be a manager at McDonalds for the same starting pay? Canada has had problems, Australia, and now German Air traffic controllers are about to strike. Ask any commercial or private pilot how the contract flight service station "service" is now, compared to when it was under the FAA...lousy. And I am curious, since ATC trainees only need a GED, why don't you tell your lawn service guy to fill out an application...then again, how many lawn care technicians spend 3 years in on-the-job training before they can cut their first blade of grass on their own...there are, after all, so many lives at stake, if he doesn't lower the cutting deck to the proper height. luv2croon Posted April 6, 2009 2:19 PM
- I've seen both sides of this argument. Quite honestly, the controllers are not over worked, nor do they work a "full" eight hour shift, nor are they denied breaks during the day. And the imposed work rules require you to show up on time and perform the duties you are paid for. It is a shame that you can't realize that fireman, policemen, EMT's, military...all make tremendously less that what controller's are paid. There is no room for a union in a government agency as it is...see PATCO 1981 strike. The pay and benefits are good for the amount of work being done. I think Mr. Babbitt will look at both sides and make a decision this is for the good of ALL! SICK OF THE WHINING Posted April 2, 2009 8:55 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









