TOPICS
TOPICS
Personnel pick remains flexible on pay-for-performance systems
President Obama's personnel chief-designate on Thursday told senators he would review pay-for-performance systems with an open mind.
During a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on his nomination to become director of the Office of Personnel Management, John Berry said he was amenable to any effective compensation system, but that the federal government has an obligation to ensure employees with comparable job performances receive similar pay and treatment.
"I do not come into this with any predetermined belief or commitment to anyone on these issues," he said. "We ought to see if this is working, can we transfer it. And if it's not working, let's fix it."
Berry's statement came in response to questions from Sens. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, and George Voinovich, R-Ohio -- the only committee members to attend the hearing -- on how he planned to evaluate alternatives to the General Schedule, including the Defense Department's National Security Personnel System. Voinovich noted that although NSPS and the Transportation Security Administration's pay-for-performance systems have proven controversial, he has heard some success stories and would not want to rush to repeal them.
"I don't have any sacred cow that I come into this with, other than the merit principles," Berry said. "That has to be the polestar. That has to be our evaluative tool."
He also pledged to preserve veterans preference and supplement it with training programs to prepare veterans for federal jobs. And he promised comprehensive reviews of proposals to improve the security clearance and hiring processes.
Berry said it was important for agencies to use all the recruitment tools at their disposal, citing relocation benefits as an example of flexibilities that could keep agencies competitive with the private sector.
"We would regularly lose people because it costs $10,000 to $20,000 to move your family from the East to the West coast," he said. "People can't pay that out of their pockets."
The senators noted that for Berry to be effective, he would need to address some smaller-scale issues at his own agency. OPM ranked 25th out of 30 large agencies on the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service's 2007 Best Places to Work rankings.
"I think the best way you can help other agencies is to get your agency working in terms of management and in terms of employee satisfaction so you can use your agency as a role model," Voinovich said. "You're going to have to spend the next couple of years shaping that joint up."
Berry said he would hold OPM to the standards of excellence he has pursued throughout his career, setting a strategic plan and strong performance goals. He added that he would meet with individual managers and conduct regular town hall discussions. That model should encourage employee engagement at other agencies, he said, stressing the importance of partnerships between labor and management, and between political and career appointees.
"It's not a hard thing to do if you're willing to have open communication," Berry said. "My promise to our management organizations and labor organizations is there will not be surprises. I'm not a shoot from the hip kind of guy. I will bring them in on a regular basis. And I believe it's my job to make sure that's happening at other agencies."
The full Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee must vote on Berry's nomination before it proceeds to the Senate.
If confirmed, Berry would be the highest-ranking openly gay official in the executive branch. But his stance on issues affecting gay and lesbian federal employees did not come up during the hearing, except when Akaka commended him for his work combating sexual orientation discrimination at the Interior Department, where he was assistant secretary for policy, management and budget during the Clinton administration, and when Berry's partner, Curtis Yee, was introduced. In his nomination disclosure forms, Berry noted that he makes annual contributions to the Human Rights Campaign, one of the largest gay rights lobbying groups.
Berry declined to comment after the hearing on the imminent introduction of a bill that would extend health and retirement benefits to the domestic partners of gay and lesbian federal employees. He said he could not discuss specific policies until after his confirmation.
COMMENTS
- I have been responsible for a SECNAV mandated professional publication for 10 years. All aspects, as I am a staff of one. Under NSPS my accomplishments have been downgraded to essentially a standard piece of office equipment. I received 1.3% of the pay pool. NSPS has been created to eliminate personnel at random. To insult and destroy the true functions of their jobs. To downgrade at will. The supervisor that wrote my appraisal had never met me, nor ever talked to me. I am supervised by managers that have no idea what I do for a living. I am now in a legal battle due to harassment and discrimination. I am paying legal fees that should not be incurred. I have been working 46 years and have a long standing record of exceptional management and leadership abilities as well as a high sense of integrity and accountability. The civilians are graded upon by military that have no idea who you are. Objectives are set that are so ambiguous that not even the President could meet them. I don't think NSPS can be fixed. If Mr. Berry and President Obama want pay for performance system, then they need to get rid of NSPS, reinstate GS and actually get someone who cares about the civilian employees to design a system that is fair and non-judgmental. Nuff said. Janice Posted April 2, 2009 9:18 AM
- Perhaps it should be the congressional representatives who should be paid in accordance to performance; say, $1 in salary plus healthcare benefits annually, until the budget deficit is nil. Reasonable and fair . . . from the viewpoint of the people. rbblum Posted April 1, 2009 10:02 PM
- I'm a GS-09 and was put into NSPS. When I took over the job they said I was not management and only had oversight of 2 contractors When NSPS they converted me without telling me or my sup saying I was management. This happened to about 80 other folks. My Union present went to the FLRA for a clarification of unit and got me moved back to GS. Janis Posted April 1, 2009 10:20 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









