TOPICS
TOPICS
Legislation would require more training for federal managers
Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, has introduced legislation that would provide more training and new performance standards for federal managers.
"The performance of our federal employees and managers is essential to the success of our government," said Akaka, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Federal Workforce Subcommittee. "We will do well to invest in them through training and professional development."
The 2009 Federal Supervisor Training Act would require all agencies to provide new managers with training on developing performance expectations with their employees and evaluating them within their first year on the job. Current managers would have three years to take the training for the first time. After the initial guidance, all managers would have to receive refresher training every three years.
Akaka's legislation also would require that managers receive training on whistleblower, collective bargaining and anti-discrimination laws; have mentors; and learn how to mentor their own employees.
And the bill would set new performance expectations for managers. Depending on the results of their own annual evaluations, managers would receive training in areas identified for improvement.
"Federal employees perform at their best when they are led by well-trained, highly competent supervisors and managers," said Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service. "Sen. Akaka's Federal Supervisor Training Act will ensure that federal supervisors develop and maintain the skills necessary to engage employees in achieving better organizational performance."
Akaka introduced similar legislation in 2007. Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., who chairs the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, issued a report supporting the legislation in November 2008. It was placed on the legislative calendar at that time, but the Senate did not act on the bill before the end of the 110th Congress.
"The price to federal agencies of poor supervision can be enormous," Lieberman wrote in his 2008 report. "Weak supervisors not only cause job performance to suffer, but also harm morale and drive good employees away, adding to recruitment and training costs. And supervisory behavior affects the number of complaints and grievances, which can impose large costs and burdens on agencies to resolve."
Paul Rowson, managing director of WorldatWork, a global human resources association, said Akaka's bill could help federal agencies catch up to the private sector in management training.
"The private sector has acknowledged this for years and many organizations have elevated first-line leader training as a core part of ongoing leadership development efforts," he said.
COMMENTS
- In the Human Performance Technology community it is an accepted stat that when training alone is chosen as the performance intervention, it fails about 80% of the time. Environmental supports such has clear guidance, clearly defined roles and responsibilities, recognition for doing well and consequences for poor performance are essential. John Bryant Posted April 6, 2009 5:51 PM
- I couldn't agree more with HL Williams. That is the case in the USDA/IG. The IGs in general are a tight community. Those offices are little kingdoms where a few reign due to cryonism and favoritism. All the taxpayers money wasted in mgt "trainings" will never eliminate the root of the problem. Those managers who received promotions to supervise don't need to comply with requirements; they get by doing what they want to do merely thru the support of their friends above looking out for them. Managers who know they will never be disciplined for not following rules accommodate any training received to tehir own prejudices; after the trainings, is business as usual for them, and the SES above their heads tolerate their inefficiencies. STOP wasting taxpayers money! Managers should have been trained to supervise before (not after) they are hired proving they WERE ready to supervise. KC Posted March 31, 2009 2:26 PM
- In DoD, until military officers are made to value civilian managers like they value our military counterparts, senior service schools will be hard to get to. I have been told through the years that I am "too valuable to let go for a year to attend a senior service school" like the War College or the Industrial College of the Armed Forces. I even had a 2 star general ask me as a PERSONAL FAVOR, NOT to go, which I did (a decision I came to regret later). How about starting to train THEM first - without their approval, we don't stand a chance! Suzanne Posted March 30, 2009 2:33 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









