TOPICS
TOPICS
OPM offers training to agencies involved in stimulus efforts
The Office of Personnel Management is reaching out to federal agencies to help them staff up quickly and use human capital strategies to implement the requirements of the massive stimulus package.
Angela Bailey, OPM's deputy associate director for talent and capacity policy, said on Friday that the agency has launched a stimulus support initiative to help agencies tailor specific workforce strategies to their individual needs and apply governmentwide tools and special hiring flexibilities to meet the requirements of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. As part of that effort, OPM hosted a forum on March 3 for agencies involved in meeting the law's requirements.
"What we want to do is assist [the agencies] in being able to quickly staff up, but to do it in a smart way that is cognizant of the fact that we are still operating under the merit principles and veterans' preference," Bailey said.
OPM's stimulus support initiative follows a three-pronged approach, the first of which is alerting federal agencies to the available flexibilities to hire employees faster, Bailey said. For example, agencies can use an excepted service authority to hire veterans who are 30 percent or more disabled, or the Veterans Recruitment Appointment Program to hire veterans temporarily to positions up to the General Schedule 11 level without issuing a vacancy announcement. Also, while most agencies likely are recruiting mid-level to senior-level employees, she said, they can use flexibilities like the Federal Career Intern Program and the Student Career Experience Program to hire employees for entry-level jobs.
Bailey said OPM also alerted forum participants that other flexibilities -- such as direct-hire authority, which allows agencies to bring on individuals without using formal ranking and rating procedures, and dual compensation waivers, which permit agencies to rehire federal annuitants -- must be approved by OPM and only in cases where an agency has a critical hiring need.
"We owe the American public something better than simply throwing out the rules," Bailey said. "We had the merit system in place when we got through the Great Depression; we had veterans' preference during World War II. The federal government is quite capable of reacting to crisis with its current rules and regulations."
Bailey said the second part of its approach is assisting agencies with workforce planning and the tools necessary to meet the stimulus requirements. This involves identifying critical jobs, and then tailoring a recruiting and hiring strategy to attract individuals with the appropriate expertise, she said.
The third aspect involves notifying agencies of a reimbursable service OPM provides, where federal employees and contractors work alongside agency human resource staff to help with job fairs, training and other HR services. "We can supplement their workforces if that's what they need in order to help them staff up to meet the Recovery Act," Bailey said.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on March 5 recommended that OPM give federal agencies blanket fast-track hiring authorities, such as direct-hire authority and dual compensation waivers, to implement the stimulus package. An OPM spokesman said on Friday that the agency has not received a formal request from Congress to provide those authorities.
Still, Bailey said it's up to Congress to pass legislation that would provide agencies with the blanket authority to rehire federal annuitants, a proposal OPM has long pushed for to help meet critical staffing shortages as many federal workers retire. Currently, salaries for re-employed annuitants are reduced by the amount of their pensions. OPM must approve the authority for agencies only with critical hiring needs, and those restrictions often force many retirees to work for federal contractors, where they can earn their full annuity and salary.
Bailey also expressed concern that providing blanket fast-track hiring authorities would limit federal agencies' recruiting and hiring strategies. "What happens is that everyone fixates on direct-hire authority or dual compensation waivers, but that does a disservice because you throw out everything else that might possibly assist [agencies] better," she said.
For example, Bailey said, providing such authority could prevent agencies from tackling the true problem in federal hiring -- the lengthy application process and a lack of communication with applicants.
"We have examples of where we have given agencies all kinds of authorities, but they're still unable to hire people," she said. "You can't more quickly hire nobody."
COMMENTS
- None of any of this matters if the RIGHT people are not hired. Numbers of people do not do good work. People who are knowledgeable and can start working right away are what makes a difference. My fear is that people will hire up and end up with folks that aren't as qualified as they thought they were. Try properly spending billions of dollars with peoeple who aren't ready. AT Posted March 16, 2009 7:13 AM
- OPM is a rogue agency with a reputation for selectively ignoring federal hiring laws it is charged with upholding. It's consultative role to other federal agencies should be very limited. There has been virtually zero oversight of OPM's program activities since 1990 and both the agency management and it's IG have engaged in past illegal conduct. OPM desparately needs an organizational review. Ken Huffman Posted March 10, 2009 9:04 PM
- Dan Diviney says "actions do not lie." Your right, Dan. In almost every corner of DOD even when it recruits outside of itself via federal-wide and/or DEU recruitments for mid and upper level positionsin the admin and financial fields, it ends up hiring only and MERELY current or prior DOD staffers of some sort (GS or military or contractor) nearly 100% of the time. Now is that action/hiring outcomes indicative of 'seaching for the best and the brightest?' Over the last 10 years or so I've applied for well over 9,000 DOD positions in my field from GS-09 to GS-15 - FROM GS-09 to GS-15. Almost all of these 'searches for excellence' were recruited at US taxpayer expense outside of DOD - via fed-wide and/or DEU recruits. And my app was referred about 95% of the time. But where it really counted - being seriously considered - I was asked to interview perhaps 3 times. Again, my app was seriously considered a mere 3 times out of nearly 9,000 referrals for positions in my field from GS-09 to GS-15 that were purported 'searches for excellence' outside of DOD. In a word, I find this outcome preposterous on its face. And it is preposterous due to the objective and unquestioned strength and relevance of my professional experience AND my formal educational preparation AND my overall credentials. But what is even more abrasive, and what really tells the full story, is that nearly every single one of the 9,000 selectees were among a very 'select' applicant subgroup. They were selected among only AND MERELY current or prior DOD staffer applicants. If any of these DOD hiring 'managers' ludicrously perceive that excellence can only be gained within DOD orgs and/or that the best and the brightest are only found among within and among merely current or prior DOD personnel, then these 'leaders' ought not EVER again use and abuse and squander US taxpayer funds and waste external applicants time and NEVER AGAIN choose to recruit Navy positions outside of DOD! I know that this language is strong. But it is also fully truthful. And this self-serving and self-financial gain driven ridiculousness ought to be a source of embarrassment and self-improvement for the DOD and its hiring 'managers.' Michael J. Smith, MPA Posted March 10, 2009 11:27 AM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









