TOPICS
TOPICS
Democratic lawmaker to push for bigger federal pay raise
The chairman of a House government reform subcommittee said on Wednesday that said he would push for a federal pay raise as high as 3.9 percent in fiscal 2010 and advocate for parity between civilian and military pay outlined.
During the National Treasury Employees Union legislative conference in Washington, Rep. Stephen Lynch called the size of the 2010 civilian pay raise "fluid," but "fluid in the right direction." The Massachusetts Democrat is the new chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Federal Workforce Subcommittee. "When I raised a concern, they said, 'Don't beat us up yet, that's not a final number.' We're pushing on our end for parity, but we want even the military number to move up," he said.
The president's fiscal 2010 budget recommends a 2 percent pay raise for civilian employees and a 2.9 percent boost for military service members.
Lynch said he hoped the final number for the pay raise would reflect the rise in the cost of living, and mentioned 3.9 percent as a possible goal, but told the crowd of several hundred activists "Don't quote me," as they headed out to meetings with other congressmen.
NTEU president Colleen Kelley said in a press briefing on Wednesday that parity was her main objective.
"The pay issue, of pay parity, this is one [where] our discussions will be different than they have been in the past because this year we have an administration who wants to talk to us and who wants to work with us," she said. "When we have people like [House Majority Leader] Steny Hoyer who are going to work with the administration also, I think it's possible."
Lynch is off to a fast start as subcommittee chairman. He introduced legislation that will make changes to the Thrift Savings Plan and the Federal Employee Retirement System on Tuesday, and will mark up the 2009 Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act on March 25. Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told NTEU members on Tuesday that the parental leave bill was a "common-sense" initiative, and he hoped it would pass Congress quickly.
Lynch told NTEU activists that his ambitions range further. He plans to include enhanced whistleblower protections in reauthorizations of the Office of Special Counsel and the Merit Systems Protection Board, and legally establish collective bargaining rights for Transportation Security Administration employees.
Collective bargaining rights for TSA screeners is a major priority for NTEU. Kelley said that when she met with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, she reaffirmed the union's belief that Napolitano can extend collective bargaining rights to TSA workers if she chooses to. Napolitano said at a hearing last week that she was looking into whether she had that authority.
NTEU has begun organizing the agency's local union chapters even though the union cannot yet negotiate contracts for those workers. The American Federation of Government Employees also is organizing TSA locals, but Kelley said the two unions were not working together.
"I would like to work with anyone who has those same goals," she said. "To date, AFGE has not been interested in working with NTEU on that, and the conversation has not gotten to ground rules for an [union] election."
But TSA is not the only agency where the relationship between unions and management is at stake. Lynch said in an interview after his speech that he would like to consult with the subcommittee's working group on personnel issues to develop a bill to reestablish the Clinton-era labor-management partnerships, with some changes. Lynch would not specify what parts of the Clinton partnerships he would like to see altered, but said economic circumstances and the budget would have to be taken into account.
Lynch also said he expects to meet with John Berry, President Obama's nominee to lead the Office of Personnel Management to share some suggestions for the agency.
COMMENTS
- It should be pay parity and it should stay pay parity. This increase has nothing to do with others losing their jobs. If the unemployment rate is at 10 or even 20%, this means that 80 or 90% are still working and thus neither the unemployment rate nor the employment rate is the basis for this increase. Parity should stand. Will Posted March 25, 2009 8:43 PM
- Why should city ,state , county and federal employs keep getting cost of living raises when people in the general public are taking concessions.Goverments say they have a shortage of revenue and they need to increase taxs , fines , fees ,levy,s .With the lay-offs their revenue has been cut , how can they keep spending. Just wondering chris meade Posted March 18, 2009 9:16 PM
- I'm all for a raise and better health care benefits too. The cost of everything has risen, it seems exponentially, in the past few years: dental, vision, health benefits, food, clothing, home appliances, entertainment, etc, etc. Our dollars are buying less, and less, and our salaries are not keeping up. A fair raise is in order just to keep up with the cost of living. And it only makes sense that folks in the military should be making a living wage too. PNW Fed Worker Posted March 12, 2009 4:39 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









