TOPICS

Members of a House committee on Friday urged the Defense Department to stop converting employees to its new personnel system until a thorough review of the system by Congress and the administration is completed.

The National Security Personnel System "made wholesale changes to the current federal employee system, resulting in widespread distrust and discontent within the ranks of the hundreds of thousands of dedicated DoD employees, both among those who have been converted and those who have not yet been converted to NSPS," wrote Reps. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Solomon Ortiz, D-Texas, in a Feb. 11 letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates.


RELATED STORIES

The department has added more than 205,000 nonbargaining unit employees to NSPS since 2006 and planned to bring an additional 3,600 into the system in the coming months.

The letter also pointed to recent reports by the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Budget Office that highlighted concerns over the cost of NSPS versus its benefits as well as a perceived lack of transparency in the new system. The lawmakers also questioned the Bush administration's last-minute move to issue controversial labor relations, hiring and promotion rules that "go beyond the intent of Congress when it enacted revisions to NSPS" in the fiscal 2008 National Defense Authorization Act.

Pentagon spokesman Les Melnyk said on Friday that Defense officials just learned of the lawmakers' request to halt NSPS and are evaluating its impact on the planned conversion of employees to the system. The department also is examining how a Jan. 21 White House memorandum, which suspended all pending federal rule changes issued by the previous administration, will affect the new personnel rules imposed by Bush. Those rules take effect March 17, Melnyk said.

During the campaign, then-Sen. Obama pledged to either overhaul or repeal NSPS.

Richard Brown, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees, on Friday praised the decision to halt conversion to NSPS, noting that the country has too many pressing needs to justify any more resources going to a failed personnel system. "It is a disgraceful waste of tax-payers' money to continue converting Defense workers to NSPS when the entire program might shortly be repealed," he said.

This story has been updated to reflect the latest news.

COMMENTS

  • I'm always amazed at the defenders of the GS system. I was exposed to it while detailed to Pax River and found it to be an utter disaster. There was no reward for accomplishment and no punishment for failure. So long as you could sit in a chair for 30 years, you'd get the same pay as a guy working his butt off. Luckily, I worked at China Lake which abandoned GS in the 70s for the Demonstration Project (DP). DP was in large part the prototype for NSPS. It worked wonders by giving employees a reason to work hard and achieve! Both recruitment of top talent and separation of under performers increased dramatically. The DP system took 2 to 3 years to work out the bugs and establish a common understanding of how it would work. So my advice to the NSPS naysayers is to be patient! It takes a cultural change for both management and employees used to the cushy safety of GS to recognize the benefits a performance-based system has to offer.
  • PAA3 Should scare even those that aproved of NSPS up untill now. I watched as my rater logged in to paa3 recorded the initial appraisal verified his face to face with me and signed off on the Higher Level Reviewer. Each and every catagory now shows up as completed. I never logged on to the computer to verify and approve of the plan and our inter-action and the Higher Level Reviewer has no clue that his review has taken place in cyber space. I appealed my first NSPS rating and won. I was given a four on my secound rating just to keep me from appealing again, as my unit pulled a shinanigan and replaced my military supervisor whom had lost computer privlidges with a new rater one day after higher headquarters demanded my appraisal. Now half way through my third appraisal I will be handed off to a Guest Supervisor due to the fact that my rater and Higher Level reviewer are both leaving and no one else in my unit is trained in NSPS. Those of you that sing the praises of NSPS need to walk a mile in my shoes. This rating system controls my future, my families well being and my sanity, Get Rid of it NOW!
  • I have the priviledge of teaching the basic NSPS courses at our installation. I am also part of the NSPS help desk. I am also an administrator in the Pay Pool. None of which was in my original PD. It takes a lot of my time. I have a lot of other responsibilities that still have to be accomplished. I have been converted to NSPS since February 08. I LIKE THE SYSTEM. Yes, it has some areas that need to be worked on but it will never work if you do not do your part to help build rather than tear down. What amazes me most is the 12 and 13 grades I see in the write ups doing the most whining. You now have a system that with some work has 5 to 8 people other than your supervisor to insure fair grading. It is not the supervisor that decides the final rating. Guess what? It is not GS anymore. Did you notice we had a very small percentage of people graded 1. That is because they got the message that what gets watched gets done.

CORRECTION: The original version of this story incorrectly noted that the Pentagon had added more than 187,000 nonbargaining unit employees to NSPS since 2006 and planned to bring an additional 15,000 into the system in the coming months. In fact, the department has added more than 205,000 nonbargaining unit employees to NSPS since 2006 and planned to bring an additional 3,600 into the system in the coming months. The Office of Personnel Management provided the incorrect data.