TOPICS
TOPICS
Panel dismayed by rise in overseas Defense contracting
House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee members on Thursday claimed that Defense Department payments for contractor services rose by 183 percent since 2000, while military pay has gone up only 5 percent.
They also complained that they have been unable to get detailed accounting on who the contractors are and what they are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We have more contractor personnel in Iraq than government employees," Rep. James Moran, D-Va., said. "Something's wrong. It's out of balance."
Moran, who chaired the hearing on defense contracting, said the budgeted cost of contracted services, which does not include procurement of weapon systems or equipment, is now $35 billion, an increase of $20 billion since the wars began.
Rep. Norman Dicks, D-Wash., said an Army undersecretary could not tell him how many contractors were in Iraq and Kuwait. "In my mind, this was a deliberate attempt to keep that information from Congress," he said. Defense Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member C.W. (Bill) Young, R-Fla., asked if the panel could get a detailed list of the contracts, cost and number of employees provided. The witness, Army Lt. Gen. N. Ross Thompson, said he could not account for all the Pentagon service contracts but promised to provide that information on Army contracts, which are a majority of the total. Moran requested that the data be provided before work started on the fiscal 2010 Defense appropriations.
Thompson said there were a total of 266,688 contractor personnel in the Central Command area -- which includes Iraq and Afghanistan -- as of mid-January. Of that, 41,000 were U.S. citizens and most of the others were "host nation citizens" who were hired in an effort to rebuild the local economy. Thompson, principal military deputy to the Army's assistant secretary for acquisition, logistics and technology, conceded that because of the post-Cold War cuts in the military, the Army did not have sufficient support personnel to handle the rapid growth in demand for services in Iraq or enough contracting personnel to supervise the outsourced work. But he insisted that the Army has made "steady and significant" progress in correcting the problems documented in a 2007 study by a high-level commission. The progress includes appointing newly authorized one- and two-star generals to head the Expeditionary Contracting Command located in Central Command and other contracting and acquisition oversight positions.
The Army also is well on the way to adding 1,400 military and civilian personnel to bring back under Army control a large number of services out-sourced during the buildup in Iraq, and is rebuilding its acquisition work force, he said. Young acknowledged that the reduction in acquisition personnel was partly due to a demand by former House Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., to sharply reduce what he called "Pentagon shoppers." Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., asked Thompson if congressional "earmarks," which direct funding for specific projects not requested by the services are helpful or harmful. Thompson did not answer directly, but noted "the strategic objective is full and open competition" and the need for a product "has to start with a mission."
COMMENTS
- Why not send in a team of retired,impartial, experienced contracting professionals (under the rehire annuitants program) to perform an IG on behalf of the USA and Defense Appropriations? Why not move the 'contracting functions' in support of these procurements to a more 'neutral' country, and have an 'active' ACO function in the respective regions? LB Posted February 14, 2009 12:53 PM
- The shift from direct hire to contractors began in at least USAID (development work) just after Vietnam to reduce the number of government employees to make congress happy. My understanding was that at that time there were congressional pressures to reduce the number of government employees.It apparently looked good on paper but certainly cost more...a lot more. The shift increased the costs of projects to perhaps double, maybe even more, but the number of government employees was reduced. Dick Scott Posted February 13, 2009 5:25 PM
- There are lots of jobs in Iraq and Afghanistan that could be done by our CS. Cooks, laundry, barbers, unloading trucks, making beds. There is no question that a larger CS presence is needed dan ketter Posted February 13, 2009 4:09 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









