TOPICS
TOPICS
Lawmakers reintroduce paid parental leave bill
House lawmakers on Thursday reintroduced legislation that would provide paid parental leave benefits to all federal employees.
The bill (H.R. 626), sponsored by Reps. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.; Frank Wolf, R-Va.; Steny Hoyer, D-Md.; Danny K. Davis, D-Ill.; and Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., would provide all federal employees with four weeks of paid leave for the birth or adoption of a child. A similar measure passed the House in the 110th Congress. Companion legislation was introduced in the Senate but did not make it out of committee.
Currently employees can use a combination of paid annual leave, paid sick leave and unpaid leave for childbirth or adoption under the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act. Federal parents can take up to 12 weeks of unpaid maternity or paternity leave and up to 13 days of paid sick leave to care for newborn or adopted children.
"Families should not have to choose between a paycheck and getting their newborn home and settled in, especially in these economic times," Maloney said. "With [this legislation], the federal government can make family-friendly more than a buzzword and ensure that both newborns and the government benefit."
In addition to providing four weeks of paid leave, the measure would allow employees to use accumulated annual or sick leave to reach the 12 weeks of unpaid leave guaranteed under current law.
Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., said on Thursday that he planned to introduce companion legislation in the Senate.
In 2001, the Office of Personnel Management, which administers leave policy, published a report that found the federal government's leave policies compared favorably with those of the private sector's. The Bush administration had proposed offering a short-term disability insurance benefit to help some employees, particularly those who needed large amounts of leave early in their careers.
By failing to provide paid parental leave, the government lags the private sector and many industrialized nations, the bill's sponsors argue. A study conducted last year by the Joint Economic Committee found that 75 percent of Fortune 100 companies offered new mothers some form of paid leave, typically lasting six to eight weeks. Additionally, more than 163 industrialized nations guaranteed paid maternal leave, with 45 of those countries also providing paid paternal leave.
"The aim of this legislation is to keep the federal workforce in step with the private sector, which has been providing this benefit for many years," Wolf said. "And with the coming wave of federal retirements, we must ensure that federal employment is a competitive option for young Americans starting families."
COMMENTS
- I have only 80 hours vacation time left at work, and I had to have a hysterectomy that requires at least 6 weeks recovery time. Will I still get paid for the rest of the time that I will be out as long as I am under the doctor's care? monica broussard Posted June 10, 2009 10:43 PM
- Some people here are focusing on "right now" too much. tomorrow will come and this "crisis" will be over and the changes provided in this bill will still be necessary. we have a responsibility to the future of our nation and that starts with newborns. those without kids are saying "why no leave for me?" well i havent had to use the FMLA, but i am not complaining that it exists. look beyond your own needs and accept the responsibility of being an adult in our country. i work for the gov and i LOVE it. i wouldnt dream of returning to the private sector. with 20% of our workforce voluntarily deployed to iraq or afghanistan their positions remain open for them to return to... no one complains about that. their work isnt waiting for them either, it is spread out to everyone and we all do our duty and the wheels keep turning. i dont have kids and may never, but i still support this and would for any company considering it. Katie USACE Posted April 14, 2009 4:28 PM
- At this time whe so many are out of work why do some think that they are entitled to paid leave to have a child. Take the risk of the public sector, the risk of being let go because times are hard. Do you think that an employee is not missed by a business when they take off on four weeks of paid leave. If a business can make it with an employee out for an additional four weeks to have a child plus holidays, vacation and sick leave maybe they really do not need that employee. Maybe there would not be so many people out of work these days if the public sector did not give there employees four weeks of paid leave to have a baby. Here is a thought maybe if the office can survive with out your four four weeks and pay you, give you paid holidays, paid vacation and sick leave, they could save money just by letting you go because apparently your services are not needed or valuable. Apparently keeping you in that position would be FRAUD. WASTE AND ABUSE OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS! ICED Posted March 20, 2009 8:33 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









