TOPICS

Federal employee unions reacted angrily to an executive order issued Monday that strips collective bargaining rights from thousands of employees at five departments.

"The Bush administration has spent the entire eight years in office attempting to destroy collective bargaining agreements in all sectors of the workforce, and unfortunately, federal labor unions have been the easiest target for them," said Matt Biggs, legislative director for the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers. "This is a vindictive and deplorable swipe at federal workers on the way out the door."

Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents 1,500 employees at the Justice Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the Treasury Department's Tax and Trade Bureau, said the executive order could invalidate the collective bargaining agreements signed in April to cover those workers.


RELATED STORIES

She said NTEU would pursue every possible option to overturn the order.

The executive order also affects about 8,600 workers in divisions of the Energy, Homeland Security, and Transportation departments who "have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative or national security work."

The 1978 Civil Service Reform Act gave the president the power to use executive orders to block employees who work in national security or intelligence from organizing. Former President Jimmy Carter issued the first executive order under that authority in 1979.

Union leaders dismissed the administration's argument that national security was at stake.

"It is absurd and insulting to suggest that giving a voice on the job to the very employees most committed to national security could jeopardize security," said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney.

Mark Roth, general counsel of the American Federation of Government Employees, who noted that the union's members are not affected by the order, said he thought President-elect Barack Obama would move quickly to overturn it after his inauguration on Jan. 20. Nick Shapiro, a spokesman for the Obama-Biden transition team, said the incoming administration would not comment on the executive order during the transition period.

If the order takes effect before Obama is sworn in, it may not be easy to overturn. But it does not include an effective date, so it is unclear when it will be enforced.

COMMENTS

  • Sorry, folks, I just can’t resist. Skeeter, Jimmy was down home on the farm “3 years ago”. And… I THINK he was a Dixie-crat. (I DID warn you guys. *^) Okay, yes, I’m sure you meant almost “30” years ago but your command of the Queen’s English so normally SOOoo perfect… Back to the plot… IMHO, much like NSPS, the complaint doesn’t appear to be against the intent of the EO itself but rather in its application. It truly does appear to be a mean-spirited swipe at those who have worked so diligently to put his missions in place. It’s kinda like an owner who kicks the dog after stepping in his doodoo out in the yard. Where else do you expect him to go? He did what you told him to do. Still, this particular EO seems to have been overcome by events. As MANY here have pointed out, Ronny proved the basic difference between government and civilian unions decades ago with PATCO. The current letters of agreement, signed by local and centralized commanders everywhere, relegate our unions to arbitrator status. And this Executive Office objects to even those few threadbare limits on their authority. Once more, this action appears unnecessary, arbitrary, and just plain mean-spirited; and I can only pray Barack has the time to undo all the havoc this impotent POTUS has wreaked.
  • The executive order that Bush invoked was 1st put in place 3 years ago by Jimmy Carter, correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't he a Democrat??
  • Tom: "TigerHawk, First, managers are usually not members of a union, they are managers." I know. I was being sarcastic with my post towards everyone blaming unions for the downfall of everything from the economic sector to the chicken crossing the road...

CORRECTION: The original version of this story incorrectly transposed the comments of Matt Biggs and Mark Roth.