TOPICS
TOPICS
Foreign Service officers clamor for security clearance reform
A group of Foreign Service employees on Monday urged President-elect Barack Obama to reform what they claim is an arbitrary security clearance process.
"Security clearance adjudication today is a matter of the luck of the draw," Daniel Hirsch, founder of Concerned Foreign Service Officers, wrote in a Nov. 7 letter to Obama. "The Bush administration and others have devoted some attention to security clearance reform, but their efforts are aimed at improving efficiency and reciprocity rather than quality and transparency."
Concerned Foreign Service Officers is an organization of Foreign Service employees who said their security clearances were improperly suspended, and other officers who support reforming the clearance process.
CFSOs said they viewed Obama's election as especially important for Americans with foreign-born parents. Many of these citizens have language skills the State Department needs, but have trouble obtaining security clearances, the organization said. The CFSOs argued that the security clearance process is frequently arbitrary and sometimes removes high-level clearances from employees who have already been vetted, and that there is little or no chance to appeal clearance decisions.
"The belief that immigrants, the children of immigrants, those with foreign relatives, or those who adhere to certain faiths, cannot possibly be loyal enough to the United States or that within them lurks an automatic loyalty to the country and people they or their ancestors left behind, is a belief that belongs as far behind us as Jim Crow," Hirsch wrote.
The group is among others in the diplomatic community already urging the new president to improve hiring and training for Foreign Service employees. The American Foreign Service Association, which represents active and retired officers and employees, has called for a significant increase in the State Department's workforce to attract more experienced employees and provide enough staff to allow officers to rotate out of their positions for training.
"The next administration will...need to focus on Iraq, Afghanistan, the Middle East peace process, Russia, and many other bilateral and multilateral foreign policy issues," said John Naland, president of the American Foreign Service Association. "But unless urgent steps are taken to strengthen the diplomatic element of national security, no amount of jetting around the globe by the president or secretary of State will restore our nation's role as the world's leader in global affairs."
The American Academy of Diplomacy recommended in September a 16 percent increase in the size of State's workforce, a suggestion endorsed by Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio. The Academy and the nonprofit Henry L. Stimson Center have held a series of events to highlight the conclusions of their new report, which calls for expanding the workforce at State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
COMMENTS
- MAK's comment that an extra month to do the vetting is interesting, as s/he correctly focuses on the issue of proper vetting -- I am retired from the State Department and remember well the 3 years that my security clearance took. It was only by coincidence that I was again interested in working for State when I was cleared. And the clearance for the "continuing relationship" with a foreign national that I reported was not granted for almost two years. By that time, we were engaged, married, returned to the US, and she had obtained expeditious naturalization so that she could accompany me in status as an American citizen to my next post. The problem is not that it takes 3 months, or 6 months, or a year, or whatever to get a good clearance. It's that the clearance process is arbitrary and slow -- people who shouldn't get clearances sometimes get them, people who should sometimes don't, and people lose clearances for no particular reason or -- worse -- because an influential person calls Diplomatic Security and suggests that a difficult personnel problem might be solved by so-and-so losing his clearance. nurtz kid Posted December 16, 2008 11:54 PM
- Like everything else, these decisions require judgment. There are many foreign born Americans, who are loyal citizens because they appreciate how much better off they are in the US. There are always exceptions and a thorough investigation should be able to discover that. Erich Darr Posted November 12, 2008 12:30 PM
- I have to disagree with Mr. Hirsch. All you have to do in the DC area is look at all the cars with flags from other nations hanging from the rear view mirrors. I think of Pollard and his spying. In the end, I do believe that their are children of immigrants and others who put their ancestral country or religion first and the U.S. second. I fear that there is decreasing loyalty to the U.S. (I blame Republican administrations for destroying people's faith in our federal government.) These people should not be given high clearances. If there are particular needs in the foreign service, provide better pay and incentives to encourage those who can get the needed clearances to move to those areas. Concerned about easy clearances Posted November 12, 2008 8:25 AM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









