TOPICS
TOPICS
DHS employees: Mission is important, but management is not so good
There are a lot of unhappy campers at the Homeland Security Department. That's the takeaway from the 2007 Annual Employee Survey, conducted from Oct. 26 through Dec. 21. While 91 percent of respondents said the work they did was important and 80 percent enjoyed their jobs, only 18 percent of employees thought pay raises were based on job performance and only 25 percent believed promotions were based on merit. What's more, only slightly more than one-quarter of employees said managers took steps to deal with poor performers who could not or did not improve.
The survey results showed that fewer than half of employees held leadership in high regard; believed the department's culture promoted improvements in service or other outcomes; or thought Homeland Security had the talent required to accomplish its mission. The results were posted online late Thursday.
Of the 141,425 employees sampled across 13 organizational components, 65,753 responded to the electronic survey, for a response rate of 47 percent. The survey was designed to capture data across Homeland Security's various agencies, as well as draw from all levels of the workforce.
Employees at the Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement showed the most dissatisfaction with leadership, while those in the Science and Technology Directorate, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and the Coast Guard were most satisfied with leadership.
Elaine Duke, deputy undersecretary for management at Homeland Security, wrote in the department's leadership blog that it was "gratifying" that 54 percent of survey respondents said they would recommend DHS as a place to work. While not exactly a resounding endorsement, it was an improvement over the 51 percent who said they would do so in a similar survey in 2006.
Duke said that numerous reorganizations since the department's creation in 2003 and the lack of a centralized headquarters contributed to employee dissatisfaction. "While these are not excuses for low morale, as a DHS employee I can honestly say I see the challenges first-hand," she wrote.
Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, took a less charitable view. Acknowledging that the majority of employees enjoyed their work and believed it was important, the survey also showed that, "DHS and its component agencies engage in a culture of favoritism, filled with arbitrary treatment of its employees, and a refusal to empower, listen to, engage or motivate them, as well as provide them with the resources they need," Kelley said.
Kelley said the survey illustrated Homeland Security's "failure to manage effectively on a grand scale."
COMMENTS
- At one point in my Customs career, I got promoted in 1995 to be the RAC of an internal affairs office. Because I refused to turn and ignore blatant corruption within our own management, soon I became the target of multiple Treasury's OIG trumpeted investigations. When a Customs port director tried to use my office to go after an inspector for a personal vendetta, I refused. I believed in running a professional office...the majority of my subordinate agents got promoted in fact, the current U.S. Treasury's Assistant IG for Investigations used to work for me in the late 1990's. When I was rotated against my will in 1999, my SAC for IA retired in lieu of getting federally indicted along with my former Assistant Commissioner for IA (A/C). The A/C went to trial and got found non-guilty. However, the damage had been done. Customs OI was not happy with me because I refused to be manipulated like my Tucson Customs IA counterpart James 'Breck" Ellis. Soon the Jr. agents I used to coach and train became my supervisors, managers...I decided to get out at age 51 with almost 26 years in federal law enforcement and 4 as a city cop. Now is August 2009, this administration is wasting so much taxpayers money by DHS that it is hard to believe. I still have some old buddies at ICE who are ready to retire because they cannot honestly justify earning $110,000 per year at GS-1811-13...and now my understanding is that DHS' agents assigned to do internal affairs work are GS-1811-14s because the FBI, DEA and ATF pays their journeymen IA agents at the GS-1811-14. However, what DHS employees seem to miss is that the "Inspectors" assigned to the above agencies are assigned to just a few regional offices located in very large cities such as New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, washington, DC area, where the cost of living is very high. All of you guys are right on target. retiredcustoms-ice Posted August 23, 2009 10:03 AM
- There has never been more favortism and cronism in an agency as there is now. You want to be a part of Management (In Tucson AZ specifically), then learn how to golf, say yes, and find any employee (Bargaining unit or Manager)who does not support the "Boss's way" and you will be in line for the next promotion! It's simple. But God help you if you are not into waisting GOV money! CBPO Manager Posted March 11, 2009 11:09 AM
- Still waiting to hear how the presidential candidates will fix DHS. And waiting, and waiting, and waiting... Sinking Ship Posted May 27, 2008 7:35 PM
PROMO RIGHT: FIRSTLIGHT
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Telework in the Federal Government TANDBERG
Healthcare Reform: A Looming Implementation Challenge IBM-Cognos and Symantec
Out of Sight, but Not Out of Touch: Federal Executives' Assessment of Agency Telework Policy KRONOS
The State of Green Government: Response to a Mandate Juniper and HP
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM









