TOPICS

Seven major regulations adopted over the past year provide between $6.3 billion and $44.8 billion in benefits annually, while costing just $3.7 billion to $4.2 billion per year, according to a draft report by the Office of Management and Budget.

In an initial draft for comment of an annual report on the costs and benefits of federal regulations, OMB wrote that from fiscal 1997 through fiscal 2006, major rules whose impacts could be easily quantified accounted for between $99 billion to $484 billion in benefits, with costs of between $40 billion and $46 billion.

The latest estimate of benefits is higher than that for the 10-year period ending in fiscal 2005, analysts said, largely due to a new Environmental Protection Agency review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter, or soot. The new rule is expected to bring between $4 billion and $40 billion in annual benefits, much of that from avoided deaths, at a cost of $2.5 billion to $2.8 billion per year.


RELATED STORIES

OMB analysts warned that the calculation of costs and benefits is not particularly rigorous, in part because agencies use a variety of methodologies, baselines and risk assessments in their calculations, which are then rolled into summations without correcting for those differences. Also, the report noted, "Many of these major rules have important nonquantified benefits and costs that may have been a key factor in the agency's decision to promulgate a rule-making."

OMB analysts did not incorporate the dollar value associated with three major rules adopted last year that they said were particularly difficult to put into dollars. One was an air cargo screening program that yielded hard-to-measure security improvements; two others permitted the hunting of migratory birds, and only certain benefits were quantified.

For the first time this year, OMB also published a draft of its report on unfunded mandates imposed on state, local and tribal governments and the private sector by federal regulations.

Several of the proposed or final rules are in homeland security, and would impose costs largely on the private sector. Analysts highlighted the introduction of a Transportation Worker Identification Credential for port employees, which they said could cost close to $1 billion.

The report also included an update to fuel economy standards for light trucks, for which a total cost to industry was not provided.

COMMENTS

  • It is very interesting that OMB summed and published an analysis of cost-benefits that all were done using different methods and that were "not rigorous". Why would OMB foster such misleading "evidence" on the public when OMB itself issued circular A-94 of how a cost-benefit analysis should be done by government agencies! Is circular A-94 obsolete or does OMB feel the circular is not important enough to enforce? I think OMB should be held accountable for its own rules for government actions and public release of information. This is the process that brought us weapons of mass destruction and other invalid reasons to start a war. Now OMB is fostering invalid reasons to continue programs that cost us a lot but offer little or nothing other than employment for certain program managers and analysts! No wonder we cannot get the debt level under control in this country. Also, OMB is the agency that has brought us the very expensive accounting system based on accruals that is totally irrelevant to the government operation and to the public. OMB should ignore that one also and go back to improving the good cash accounting system it had and which Congress uses and relies on for appropriations. Treasury was smart enough to pull out of the tripartite of OMB, GAO and Treasury. Now if OMBV would declare cash accounting as the uniform basis for government accounting and get rid of the FASAB cloak, maybe we could get on with the important business of government and stop wasting resources on this accrual accounting these Commonly Respected Accounting Principles(CRAP).