TOPICS
TOPICS
Judge stays ex-procurement chief's sentence
In an unexpected move, a judge granted a request Thursday from David Safavian, the former head of the Office of Management and Budget's procurement policy shop, for a stay of his prison sentence, pending an appeal of his June conviction of obstructing justice and making false statements.
Safavian filed an appeal in September challenging his conviction on four counts of making false statements to General Services Administration employees and obstructing an investigation by GSA's inspector general. The charges stem from Safavian's relationship with lobbyist Jack Abramoff while serving as chief of staff at GSA, and focused on a Scotland golf trip the men took together, along with other officials, in 2002.
Appeals can take several years, so Safavian's sentence of 18 months -- if upheld -- will not begin until after that ruling.
In his opinion granting the request, U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman cited the section of U.S. Code that says that if a person is not likely to flee, and the appeal raises a substantial question of law likely to result in a reversal, new trial or different sentence, then the judge can grant a request for release on bond.
Safavian's lawyer, Barbara "Biz" Van Gelder, raised numerous legal issues before, during and after the trial, including questions about the admission of controversial e-mails between Safavian and Abramoff as evidence.
Friedman noted in his opinion that if one or more of the legal questions raised are decided in Safavian's favor, then a new trial is likely.
Justice Department prosecutor Peter Zeidenberg declined to comment. In a filing, prosecutors agreed that Safavian was not at risk of fleeing.
COMMENTS
- Now the courts are letting the crooks run free! The Justice Department should appeal this ruling and get this guy in prison! This simply illustrates that you can steal and cheat if you’re in the government at a high enough level and expect to be free to continue your life. This guy stole millions and is not in jail! If some poor guy steals a car he will be in jail for five years and it wouldn't take very long to get him there. Taxpayer Posted November 17, 2006 6:57 AM
- Let me get this right. Congressman Cunningham had a judge tell him he was a disgrace to his country for the violations of law he committed, and went so far as to deny him the right to see his mother before going to prison. Never mind the fact that he served his country and was a highly decorated fighter pilot and honorably discharged. Now we have a civilian convicted and should be serving a prison sentence, but no way. He stays out on appeal thanks to this judge who just doesn't have it in his heart to send him to prison. He must be related to the lawyer of the female teacher who molested her student, but the judge apparently agreed she was too pretty to send to jail. Is this democratic justice or a voodoo legal maneuver? This is a disgrace. This guy needs to go too prison now; not several years down the road. Guess the judge must be afraid he will lose his fat pension so he will let him stay out. Charlie (retired military) Posted November 17, 2006 11:22 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco









