TOPICS
TOPICS
Senate moves to close pay gap for feds called to military duty
The Senate last week approved a measure that would provide full federal salaries to civil servants called to military duty.
The Senate unanimously passed the language as an amendment to the fiscal 2006 Defense appropriations bill (H.R. 2863). The amendment requires agencies to supplement the military salary of federal employees called to the Reserves or National Guard, bringing their income to the level it was before their employment was interrupted.
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who introduced the amendment, said this is the fourth attempt in two years to close the pay gap for federal employees in the military. Similar amendments were included in the Senate versions of the April 2005 supplemental appropriations bill, the 2005 Defense authorization bill and the October 2003 supplemental appropriations bill. Those amendments were removed during House-Senate conference negotiations, Durbin said.
There are about 120,000 federal employees in the Reserves and the National Guard, and about 17,000 have been mobilized to Iraq, Afghanistan and other locations, Durbin's office reported.
One of those employees is Jim Daum, a safety engineer with the Federal Aviation Administration who has been serving in Iraq in the Delaware National Guard for almost a year.
Daum's wife, Mary, said her husband took a 48 percent pay cut when he was called to active duty. As an FAA engineer, he earned more than $100,000. But the pay cut forced Mary Daum, who is a stay-at-home mother, to rent out the family home and move with her four children - triplets and one younger son - to her sister's house.
"It's been a constant worry, but we've held on," she said. FAA employees have donated annual leave to the family, which has helped considerably with budgetary problems, but has not helped enough, she said.
The Daums asked FAA to make up the pay difference, but agency officials told them they could not grant the request without a law in place.
A spokesman for the Office of Personnel Management said until there is specific legislation to close the pay gap, neither OPM nor individual agencies can supplement pay for employees called to military duty.
Durbin said he hopes that this time around, the amendment won't perish in conference.
"When the lights are on, the Senate continues to overwhelmingly support this bipartisan measure," Durbin said in a statement. "Unfortunately, I have watched on three occasions as this important amendment went into the darkness of a conference committee and disappeared."
Durbin said many private companies, including Boeing Aerospace, State Farm Insurance and Sears, Roebuck & Co., close the pay gap for employees called to military duties.
COMMENTS
- The question is why the U.S. government allows employees to serve in both the civil service and the military service at the same time. If the Senate bill passes, how will morale of the active duty military be affected if two soldiers/sailors/airmen/marine doing the same job, facing the same hardship and danger get 'paid' differently? Is one actually 'worth' more than the other? Our pay reflects the value we place on the employee. If a GS-14 also serves as a 'part-time' NCO, is that NCO 'valued' more than a career "Major". The pay says yes. Then there is the question of whether the ' FAA's Safety Engineer' is more valuable protecting our country in Iraq or protecting the public by performing his 'Safety' role in the FAA. GovExec.com reader Posted October 14, 2005 4:53 AM
- Wonder if he will pay back all that extra income for weekend drills he collected over the years? Most think of the guard/reserves as a second job and even a second retirement income. Don't they consider that they could actually be called up and be paid a lower salary than what they earned at their "real" job? God forbid that his stay at home sweet thing is forced to take a job and leave the kids with grandma... GovExec.com reader Posted October 14, 2005 9:00 AM
PROMO RIGHT: GBC
Advancing the business of government through analysis, insight and the sharing of best practices.
SPONSORED RESEARCH
Achieving a Greener Federal Government IBM
Federal Cybersecurity: Securing the Nation's Information IBM
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: New Requirements for Tracking and Reporting Federal Workforce Data Kronos
Managing the Stimulus: A Candid Survey of Federal Program Managers Accenture and Microsoft
Improving Collaboration and Productivity in 21st Century Government: The Role of Communication for Government Executives Cisco
GovExec Live!
The Pentagon is almost finished revising regulations that would move 700,000 employees off the General Schedule and onto a pay-for-performance system. The regulations also are designed to streamline the employee appeals process and scale back collective bargaining.
At 12 p.m. EST on Wed., Oct. 19, J. Ward Morrow and Terry Rosen of the American Federation of Government Employees will answer your questions about the National Security Personnel System and the Homeland Security Department's proposed personnel reforms. You can submit your questions early or during the live online discussion.
