Paul Ryan Wants to Give States the Lead Role in Anti-Poverty Fight

Ryan says the current network of federal aid for the poor is “fragmented and formulaic." Ryan says the current network of federal aid for the poor is “fragmented and formulaic." Susan Walsh/AP

Click here for a detailed list of the 11 federal low-income programs Rep. Ryan wants to consolidate.

Calling the federal government the “rearguard” in the fight against poverty, a leading Republican on Thursday unveiled a plan to consolidate up to 11 federal programs for low-income Americans, giving states more flexibility to provide customized aid to the most needy.

Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan said the current network of federal aid for the poor is “fragmented and formulaic” and proposed a pilot program that would envelop food stamps, housing vouchers, child care assistance and other low-income subsidies administered by various federal agencies into one funding stream. “The idea would be to let states try different ways of providing aid and then to test the results—in short, more flexibility in exchange for more accountability,” said Ryan, the 2012 Republican vice presidential nominee and possible 2016 presidential contender. “My thinking is, get rid of these bureaucratic formulas. Put the emphasis on results. Participation would be voluntary; no state would have to join. And we would not expand the program until all the evidence was in.”

The multi-pronged approach aimed at expanding opportunity for low-income Americans also would require Congress to approve any executive regulations that “disproportionately burden low-income households,” the plan said. In addition, federal agencies would be on the hook for explaining regulations in plain language, or be penalized. “If an agency violated this requirement, it would be barred from implementing that regulation until the analysis was completed, with exceptions made for rules that addressed an immediate risk to public health or safety,” the blueprint stated.

Ryan presented the draft plan, which he hoped would start a serious conversation on reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility in this country, during a speech at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank in Washington. “Our country has had enough of politics. Let's talk solutions,” Ryan wrote in a July 24 op-ed in USA Today outlining his proposal.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the government’s War on Poverty, created during the Lyndon Johnson administration, and the House Budget Committee has held five hearings so far since January on the issue. The federal government spends about $800 billion annually on some 92 different programs to help the poor. There are more than 45 million Americans living in poverty today.

Ryan said the strategy to consolidate federal poverty programs would not cut funding. “The state would get the same amount of money as under current law—not a penny less,” the House Budget Committee chairman said. But some Democrats were skeptical, saying Ryan’s plan for consolidating low-income federal programs was merely the opening volley to future program cuts.

“The core idea of the Ryan proposal is not new,” said Maryland Democrat Chris Van Hollen, ranking member of the House Budget Committee. “It’s nothing more than a block grant gussied up with some bells and whistles.” Van Hollen; Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif.; and Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., held a conference call with reporters Thursday afternoon. President George W. Bush pushed a similar idea during his tenure, known as “super-waivers,” giving states more flexibility to combine funds and rules for a panoply of federal anti-poverty programs.

The House Democrats also argued that Ryan’s proposal doesn’t match the reality of the House Republican budget, or the GOP record on funding low-income programs.

“If you look at the Ryan [House Republican] budget, two-thirds of the $5 trillion in cuts come from programs that help low-income Americans,” Van Hollen said. “Watch what they do, not what they say.”  

The Democrats noted some areas of agreement, including Ryan’s proposal to increase the earned income tax credit for childless workers, as well as reforming the criminal justice system, particularly sentencing guidelines for non-violent offenders. Democrats, however, said they don’t support funding an expansion of EITC through the Ryan plan’s proposed elimination of various federal programs including the Social Service Block Grant, the Fresh Fruits and Vegetable Program and the Economic Development Administration.

“The rhetoric may sound like compassionate conservatism, but the reality is extreme,” said Lee, adding that Ryan’s plan was “anti-poor” and “anti-opportunity” in part because it did not support an increase in the federal minimum wage.

As for Ryan’s core proposal, the single stream of funding for anti-poverty programs, dubbed the Opportunity Grant, would require each participating state to submit to the federal government a plan meeting certain criteria for helping low-income residents. According to the plan, to receive funding states would have to spend the money solely on helping low-income people; every person who can work should work; states will have to offer recipients an additional choice for help outside the government, either through a non-profit organization, community group, or some other non-government entity; and an outside party has to measure results and track progress.

A case management-type system would be set up, and states along with other service providers would craft a customized program tailored to the individual’s needs, be it more education, job training, or subsidies for food, housing, transportation or child care.

“Think of it this way: Right now, you have to go to a bunch of different offices to enroll in a bunch of different programs,” Ryan said. “Under the Opportunity Grant, you could go to one office and work with one person for all your needs. That person would give you financial assistance, but could also act as a personal resource.”

The Wisconsin Republican said he’s “reconceiving” the federal government’s role in combating poverty, adding that Washington should support not lead such efforts. “In my view, the federal government is the rearguard—it protects the supply lines. But the people on the ground—they’re the vanguard. They fight poverty on the front lines.”

NEWSLETTER

Get daily news from Route Fifty

Top stories on how innovation is driving smarter government across the country.

FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.