<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:nb="https://www.newsbreak.com/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Government Executive - Authors - Eric Randall</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/voices/eric-randall/6634/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://www.govexec.com/rss/voices/eric-randall/6634/" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:28:25 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Hillary Clinton's secret weapon: Eyewear?</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/06/we-figured-out-hillary-clintons-secret-weapon/56424/</link><description>Glasses have been at the center of nearly all her recent scandals, memes and spurts of attention.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Randall, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:28:25 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/06/we-figured-out-hillary-clintons-secret-weapon/56424/</guid><category>Oversight</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;
	Once again Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/06/hillary-clinton-sports-mardi-gras-sunglasses-at-swearing-in-ceremony/"&gt;grabbed headlines&lt;/a&gt; and been declared &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-sports-mardi-gras-sunglasses-swearing-ceremony-235311953--abc-news-politics.html"&gt;tres cool&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;quot; this time, because she wore some purple wing-tipped Mardi Gras sunglasses while swearing in Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Michael Hammer. But we&amp;#39;ve spotted a pattern: Eyewear, it seems, is her secret weapon. Clinton&amp;#39;s non-foreign policy related media profile has spiked several times since her launch to hipness this year with the &lt;a href="http://textsfromhillaryclinton.tumblr.com/"&gt;Texts from Hillary meme&lt;/a&gt;, and as we pondered this, we noticed that glasses have been at the center of nearly all these scandals/memes/spurts of attention, a fact for which we shouldn&amp;#39;t be that surprised. But first, let us briefly explain the eyeglasses that helped drive the stories.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;strong&gt;The Mardi Gras glasses&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	This is the most immediate and obvious case for our eyewear thesis: there is no story without those crazy sunglasses. (Well, she was wearing some Mardi Gras beads as well, and we guess those contributed.) As you can see below, in her remarks, Clinton reasoned that purple is the favorite color of new Assistant Secretary Hammer, and Hammer&amp;#39;s family had come dutifully dressed in it, so she needed to get &amp;quot;appropriately attired.&amp;quot; She then put on the glasses, even wearing them as she administered an oath. Thus can we, the media, note that she is &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/06/hillary-wears-funky-glasses-to-swearing-in.html"&gt;funky&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://gawker.com/5920495/secretary-of-partying-down-hillary-clinton-wears-sassy-sunglasses-mardi-gras-beads-at-swearing-in-ceremony"&gt;sassy&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;quot; and even &amp;quot;funny,&amp;quot; according to Glen Beck&amp;#39;s website The Blaze (while they poll their readers on whether she&amp;#39;s disrespecting the Constitution.) &amp;nbsp;Clinton must realize at this point that her media presence is so flammable that even a simple prop one might purchase at the dollar store will reignite talk of her hipness.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;img border="0" height="0" src="http://c.gigcount.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.11NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEzNDAzOTYzNTkwNDYmcHQ9MTM*MDM5NjM2MjU3NCZwPSZkPSZnPTImbz1jMmVjMDFiYmJjN2E*NWJmOTRjOTMzZmM3/ZGNlOGIzNiZvZj*w.gif" style="visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" width="0" /&gt;&lt;object allowfullscreen="true" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always" data="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/1_j12h8103/uiconf_id/5590821" height="259" id="kaltura_player_1340396358" name="kaltura_player_1340396358" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="460"&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/1_j12h8103/uiconf_id/5590821" /&gt;&lt;param name="flashVars" value="autoPlay=false&amp;amp;screensLayer.startScreenOverId=startScreen&amp;amp;screensLayer.startScreenId=startScreen" /&gt;&lt;a href="http://corp.kaltura.com"&gt;video platform&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_management"&gt;video management&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://corp.kaltura.com/solutions/video_solution"&gt;video solutions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_publishing"&gt;video player&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	Read &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/06/we-figured-out-hillary-clintons-secret-weapon/53842/"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt; at The Atlantic Wire.&lt;br /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>What if Mitt Romney visited Solyndra and no one noticed?</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/06/what-if-mitt-romney-visited-solyndra-and-no-one-noticed/56047/</link><description>The presidential candidate's visit was overshadowed in the news cycle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Randall, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:09:29 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/06/what-if-mitt-romney-visited-solyndra-and-no-one-noticed/56047/</guid><category>Oversight</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Mitt Romney had a &lt;a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2012/05/31/mitt-romney-visits-solyndra.html"&gt;decent shot at owning the news cycle&lt;/a&gt; Thursday when he hosted a press conference in front of Solyndra, every conservative&amp;#39;s favorite (Obama) mistake. Talk about bad timing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	The photo op that arose from it made for some good optics, and we hadn&amp;#39;t talked about Obama&amp;#39;s investments in green energy, some of which go to companies whose ideas fail, in, oh, months (the news that federally &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2011/09/solyndras-failure-dragging-down-industry/42914/"&gt;subsidized Solyndra filed for bankruptcy&lt;/a&gt; happened months ago.) And yet, the moment went awry thanks to &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/05/john-edwards-jury-has-finally-reached-verdict/53021/"&gt;John Edwards&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	Read &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/05/what-if-mitt-romney-visited-solyndra-and-nobody-noticed/53025/"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Federal court rules against DOMA in same-sex government benefits case</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2012/05/federal-court-rules-against-doma-same-sex-government-benefits-case/56011/</link><description>Judges: 'Only the Supreme Court can finally decide this unique case.'</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Randall, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:26:41 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2012/05/federal-court-rules-against-doma-same-sex-government-benefits-case/56011/</guid><category>Pay &amp; Benefits</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	A Federal Appeals court in Massachusetts &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/31/doma-unconstitutional-ruling-appeals-court-boston_n_1559031.html"&gt;ruled Thursday&lt;/a&gt; that the Defense of Marriage Act violates the Constitution by denying federal benefits to same-sex couples and though it&amp;#39;s a narrow ruling, it&amp;#39;s still a victory for same-sex marriage advocates as the case makes its way ever-closer to the Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/05/federal-court-doma-violates-married-same-sex-couples-rights/53013/#"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the rest at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="https://cdn.govexec.com/media/img/cd/2012/05/31/053112ringsGE/large.jpg" width="618" height="284"><media:credit>Thinkstock</media:credit><media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.govexec.com/media/img/cd/2012/05/31/053112ringsGE/thumb.jpg" width="138" height="83"></media:thumbnail></media:content></item><item><title>Huge round of arrests for $450 million in Medicare fraud</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2012/05/huge-round-arrests-450-million-medicare-fraud/55543/</link><description>Attorney General Eric Holder will provide details of the arrests at a press conference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Randall, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:43:07 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2012/05/huge-round-arrests-450-million-medicare-fraud/55543/</guid><category>Pay &amp; Benefits</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/02/justice/health-care-fraud/index.html"&gt;CNN reports&lt;/a&gt; that the government has arrested 100 people in another huge health care fraud bust, and based on previous instances of this kind, there are bound to be some scandalous details forthcoming.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	The group is charged with defrauding Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal programs for a combined $450 million, according to CNN&amp;#39;s Terry Frieden, and Attorney General Eric Holder and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius are going to give details at a press conference later today. This case seems similar to &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704657704576150293189313156.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories"&gt;last year&amp;#39;s bust&lt;/a&gt;, in which the government arrested 111 people in one fell swoop for $225 million worth of fraud.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	Read the &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/05/huge-round-arrests-450-million-medicare-fraud/51833/"&gt;full story&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Photo: GSA exec in hot water</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/management/2012/04/photo-gsa-exec-hot-water/41793/</link><description>Jeffrey Neely's wife posted photos of their 2009 trip to the Las Vegas M Hotel on her Google+ account.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Randall, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:05:17 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.govexec.com/management/2012/04/photo-gsa-exec-hot-water/41793/</guid><category>Management</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	General Services Administration regional commissioner Jeffrey Neely had a rough Monday as he very publicly invoked his 5th Amendment rights during a Congressional hearing into his agency&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/04/gsa-threw-800000-party-and-all-you-got-was-bill/50663/"&gt;spending scandal&lt;/a&gt;, and photos of he and his wife doing all that aforementioned spending&amp;nbsp;leaked around the internet, thanks to &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/cheers-photos-show-embattled-gsa-official-enjoying-wine-and-soak-in-spa-tub-at-m-hotel-during-pre-conference-meeting/"&gt;ABC News&amp;#39; Jake Tapper&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Neely&amp;#39;s wife posted photos of their trip to the Las Vegas M Hotel in 2009 on her Google+ account. The trip was one of eight pre-conference &amp;quot;scouting&amp;quot; forays the agency apparently required just to make sure they weren&amp;#39;t, you know, &lt;a href="http://www.govexec.com/management/2012/04/photo-gallery-gsas-800000-conference-visual-form/41664/"&gt;wasting $800,000 of taxpayers&amp;#39; money&lt;/a&gt; on hotel with small tubs or bad views.&amp;nbsp;Judging&amp;nbsp;from Neely&amp;#39;s contented smile in the hotel tub, they weren&amp;#39;t. (Insert your own &amp;quot;in hot water joke&amp;quot; here.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Allegations that Neely took an iPod and other gadgets from a GSA building were &lt;a href="https://www.govexec.com/management/2012/04/gsa-executive-could-face-charges-stealing-ipod-other-gadgets/41788/?oref=river"&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/04/its-probably-not-good-day-be-gsa-official/51188/"&gt;Read the rest at The Atlantic Wire&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded><media:content url="https://cdn.govexec.com/media/img/cd/2012/04/16/046112neelyGE/large.jpg" width="618" height="284"><media:credit>Google Plus, via ABC News</media:credit><media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.govexec.com/media/img/cd/2012/04/16/046112neelyGE/thumb.jpg" width="138" height="83"></media:thumbnail></media:content></item><item><title>Republicans concede a payroll tax break extension without spending cuts</title><link>https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/02/republicans-concede-payroll-tax-break-extension-without-spending-cuts/41192/</link><description>Democrats have not yet agreed to the plan for a 10-month extension.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Randall, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:48:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/02/republicans-concede-payroll-tax-break-extension-without-spending-cuts/41192/</guid><category>Oversight</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	House Republicans will agree to extend the payroll tax cut for another 10 months without making up for the lost revenue with budget cuts, as they&amp;#39;d previously demanded, &lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/02/13/bloomberg_articlesLZCDJF6JTSE901-LZCED.DTL"&gt;reports Bloomberg&lt;/a&gt;. We &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/02/parts-obamas-budget-may-actually-get-passed/48622/"&gt;noted this morning&lt;/a&gt; that some kind of compromise on the extension seemed likely, with Rep. Paul Ryan giving signs to ABC&amp;#39;s &lt;em&gt;This Week&lt;/em&gt; that the two parties might actually agree to something. Bloomberg reports that the fact that the Republicans came to the Democrats on this -- though Democrats haven&amp;#39;t yet agreed to it -- seems to indicate that they learned their lesson after battling against a two-month extension in December:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		The Republican proposal reflects the desire to avoid being blamed for an impasse, as they were for a breakdown in talks that almost caused the tax break to expire at the end of December, said one of the staffers, a Republican leadership aide who spoke on condition of anonymity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The compromise is bound to annoy budget hawks, but it&amp;#39;ll likely have its cheerleaders too. Former vice chairman of the Fed Alan Blinder, for instance, &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203646004577213552167078144.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop"&gt;wrote in a &lt;em&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt; op-ed Monday&lt;/a&gt; that the cut should be extended without spending reductions: &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Continuing both policies through the end of this year should be a no-brainer ...&amp;nbsp;Democrats want to cover the cost of the extensions by imposing a surtax on incomes over $1 million and eliminating some corporate tax subsidies. Republicans want to cover the costs by extending the pay freeze on federal workers, trimming some pension benefits, and raising Medicare premiums paid by wealthier seniors.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		Here&amp;#39;s a suggested compromise: Don&amp;#39;t pay for it at all, at least not now. Raising other taxes or cutting other benefits would negate much of the stimulative impact of the payroll tax cut and the unemployment benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	Democrats apparently haven&amp;#39;t yet given up on their &amp;quot;millionaire&amp;#39;s tax&amp;quot; and accepted the offer, but if they do, it&amp;#39;ll be the rare example of a high-profile but low conflict compromise in D.C.&lt;/div&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>