Virginia Lawmakers Demand Answers on Long-Term Care Insurance Price Spike

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., is one of the lawmakers who wants answers. Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., is one of the lawmakers who wants answers. Susan Walsh/AP

This story has been updated

Some Virginia lawmakers want to know why premiums in the Federal Long-Term Care Insurance Program could skyrocket by as much as 126 percent beginning Nov. 1.

Democratic Reps. Don Beyer and Gerry Connolly – whose districts include many federal employees and retirees – are demanding answers from the Office of Personnel Management, which announced the upcoming significant increase last week. The rate increase, which will affect most enrollees, will vary widely between 0 percent and 126 percent, depending on an enrollee’s option under the Federal Long-Term Care Insurance Program. The average rate increase will be 83 percent, or $111 more per month, for enrollees who opt not to change their coverage.

“For those on a fixed or limited income, such an increase is simply unaffordable,” Beyer and Connolly wrote in a July 22 letter to acting OPM Director Beth Cobert. The lawmakers said that the significant jump in new premium rates, along with an average premium increase of 17 percent the last time the government awarded the FLTCIP contract in 2009, warranted “a reconsideration of how we structure FLTCIP so that price spikes at this extreme can be avoided.”

» Get the best federal news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

Feds and retirees with long-term care insurance have until Sept. 30 to make changes to their coverage, which Beyer and Connolly said was not enough time “for a purchasing population whose average age is 60. Medicare, by comparison, has a three-month enrollment period.”

OPM has notified enrollees about the new premiums through the mail, and feds can access the FLTCIP website to receive more information, view rates, and make coverage changes. But the Democratic lawmakers want to know what else OPM is doing to alert and educate enrollees, and seek information about how the premiums are calculated, and whether the agency and contractor plan to consider “graduated premiums without a dramatic decrease in coverage.”

The new, seven-year contract – announced in April -- retained John Hancock, which last received the contract in 2009. The insurance company was the only one to place a bid for the contract, which remained open for one year. OPM has to issue a new contract every seven years for the Federal Long-Term Care Insurance Program.

Critics of the sharp premium increases, including the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, said the change would force FLTCIP enrollees to make difficult choices: either pay significantly more for coverage, reduce their coverage, or drop it altogether. “I am stunned at the extent of the increase and angry that this type of financial pressure is being placed on federal employees and retirees,” said NARFE National President Richard G. Thissen, in a statement last week.

“It is of grave concern and urgency to our constituents to have answers before the decision period ends,” Beyer and Connolly told Cobert in the letter.

OPM said it had received the letter, and would respond to the lawmakers.

Of the approximately 274,000 current FLTCIP enrollees, about 10,000 will not be affected by the new premium increase. That group includes those who applied for coverage on or after new application rates went up on Aug. 1, 2015; enrollees who purchased FLTCI at age 80 or older; current enrollees in the FLTCIP’s alternative insurance program; and enrollees currently eligible for benefits or awaiting a decision on a pending claim.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.