Senators Want VA Wait List Manipulators to Give Back Their Bonuses

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Lawmakers have made no secret about their desire to punish employees at the Veterans Affairs Department.

Both chambers of Congress have passed legislation to ease the firing of VA senior executives and other employees, and to restrict or prohibit performance awards. A bicameral conference committee is currently negotiating an agency overhaul.

A bipartisan pair of lawmakers, however, thought the measures under consideration did not go far enough and have introduced a bill to require VA to reclaim bonuses already paid out. The legislation, introduced by Sens. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., would take back bonuses paid to VA employees involved in manipulating data related to patient wait lists at VA facilities.

The bill would authorize the VA secretary to require employees who received bonuses in 2011 or later to repay the awards if the employees contributed to a “deliberate omission from an electronic wait list the names of veterans waiting for health care.” Bonuses given to supervisors of those employees would also be rescinded if they “reasonably should have known” about the data manipulation. The legislation would task the VA inspector general with identifying these employees.

"I'm pleased this bipartisan legislation will hold responsible any VA employee found to have cooked the books on wait times, and will help us quickly recover bonuses and raises paid to those fraudsters with taxpayer dollars," McCaskill said. "And I'll continue holding the agency accountable and demanding VA leadership comply with all recommendations issued in the inspector general's interim report."

The bill would not be without precedent; former VA Secretary Eric Shinseki rescinded in May an $8,500 performance award given in 2013 to Sharon Helman, who served as director of the Phoenix VA hospital at the epicenter of the recent scandal. VA said the bonus was originally awarded due to “administrative error.”

At the time, the Senior Executives Association questioned “whether it is even legal to rescind a performance award,” and said the move continued a trend of targeting Senior Executive Service employees without proper investigations.

“The performance appraisals of senior executives and recommendations for their performance awards undergo rigorous review and oversight,” SEA said in a statement. “Performance awards are discretionary and Performance Review Boards, as well as agency heads, must sign off before an award is granted. This process ensures that a senior executive has met criteria laid out in annual performance plans that speak to individual as well as organizational performance.”

Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee and author of several bills to reprimand and punish malfeasant VA employees, said on Monday the VA secretary has the authority to rescind bonuses within a year of when they were paid.

“I am calling on him to take this action where he deems appropriate,” Miller said.

A recent USA Today report found the VA awarded $380,000 in bonuses to “directors and top executives” at 38 hospitals currently under investigation for falsifying records.

Since the VA waitlist scandal surfaced, the House has passed a bill that would remove due process rights for the agency’s senior executives. The Senate passed a bill that would hasten the termination process, but retain an employee’s appeal rights with the Merit Systems Protection Board. The House has cleared several measures to cut back on bonuses for VA employees, but none of them have passed the Senate. These differences will likely be addressed in the conference committee.

Check out a full list of the many ways Congress wants to fix the VA here

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.