Why Congress Might Want to Enact Legislation to Protect LGBT Federal Employees

SHS Photography/Shutterstock.com

Discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender federal employees has decreased dramatically in recent years, according to a new report, but Congress must still enact legislation to ensure LGBT workers are granted the same protections under the law as their heterosexual counterparts.

Just 2 percent of federal employees said they were discriminated against in the workplace due to sexual orientation, the Merit Systems Protection Board found through analysis of its own research and that of the Office of Personnel Management. About 6 percent of feds said they saw discrimination based on sexual orientation at their office, but it did not affect them personally.

While these numbers are encouraging, MSPB said, the lack of statutory recourse for federal employees who face sexual orientation-based discrimination remains problematic. The federal government created “prohibited personnel practices” in 1978, and began interpreting the ban against discrimination to include sexual orientation in 1980.

President Bill Clinton in 1998 issued an executive order that more clearly prohibited prejudice in the federal workplace on the basis of sexual orientation, but he clearly stated he did not have the authority to grant certain legal protections, such as the right to take complaints to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The 2002 Notification and Federal Employees Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act, or No-FEAR Act, requires agencies to inform workers of their rights to combat discrimination in all areas except sexual orientation.

Additionally, MSPB said, the guidance preventing prejudice against LGBT employees is based on interpretation and not law, meaning it could be reversed at any point. 

“Any ambiguity in the longstanding policy prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination would be resolved by legislation making that prohibition explicit,” the researchers wrote.

The report also pointed to some data showing LGBT employees are currently facing workplace difficulties.

In 2012, OPM began asking workers for the first time to self-identity their sexual orientation on the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. LGBT respondents consistently gave lower scores than heterosexual employees, and the overall satisfaction figures were 6 percentage points lower for LGBT workers. MSPB also found lower levels of engagement among that group. One in five supervisors said it was not clear at their agencies that sexual orientation discrimination was prohibited, while one in three non-supervisors said the same.

Still, when examined in a historical context, things are much better for the LGBT community in the federal workforce. Prior to 1975, the federal government actively examined sexual orientation as part of its hiring practices and it considered homosexuality against the priority of employing individuals with “good moral character.”

In the 1950s and 1960s, the public maintained a “campaign against employing gays and lesbians” in the federal service. Thousands of federal workers lost their jobs during this period due to their sexual orientation.

Members of Congress tied getting homosexuals out of the civil service to their campaigns against Communists, and one committee found, “homosexuals and other sex perverts were not proper persons to be employed in Government for two reasons—first, they [were] generally unsuitable, and second, they constitute[d] security risks.”

In addition to congressional action, agencies must ensure the policies of the past are not repeated in the present day, MSPB said. Federal executives should review their antidiscrimination policies to guarantee all their employees are treated fairly, the board recommended, and should work with LGBT advocacy groups for recruitment efforts. 

(Image via SHS Photography/Shutterstock.com)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.