President’s budget recommends pay parity

This story has been updated.

The president's fiscal 2011 budget proposal, unveiled Monday morning, recommends a 1.4 percent pay raise for civilian and military employees.

Administration officials praised the recommendation for civilian employees, pointing out that it's based on the traditional formula. The Employment Cost Index, one of the indicators for the formula, showed 1.4 percent growth from September 2008 to September 2009, according to White House reports. "Federal employees will get a 1.4 percent increase, which frankly I think to a lot of Americans sounds pretty good," Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag said during a press conference on Monday. "It's lower than it's been in the past, because inflation has been lower than it's been in the past." The 1.4 percent pay raise includes both a base pay increase and a locality pay raise.

The 1.4 percent pay raise would be the lowest for the armed forces since 1973, when the draft was abolished and the military became an all-volunteer force. The president requested a 2.9 percent pay raise for the military in fiscal 2010, but Congress ultimately gave members of the armed forces a 3.4 percent increase last year. Civilian workers received a 2 percent boost in fiscal 2010.

Federal employee groups and lawmakers, including House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., repeatedly have called for pay parity between members of the military and civilian workers for annual salary raises.

Hoyer, whose Maryland district is home to thousands of federal employees, said the proposed raise was consistent with the economy but that he wanted to ensure that federal pay was enough to attract qualified candidates to government.

"I think it's fair in the sense that we're going through very, very tough economic times," he said. "What we're really looking at is, 'Is it competitive?' Can we retain those that we have, and are we competitive in what's clearly a competitive market for skills?"

Federal employee unions praised the administration's effort at pay parity, but expressed concern about the size of the increase. "There's still a huge pay gap between federal and nonfederal salaries," said John Gage, president of the American Federation for Government Employees. "I think the raise should be higher. Do I think it's understandable? Yes. Do I think we have a case to make for a higher pay raise? Yes, but maybe a difficult one."

"At best, 1.4 percent is a modest adjustment. But in this economy, a modest increase is better than no increase at all," said National Federation of Federal Employees President William Dougan, who sits on the Federal Salary Council.

National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley, also a member of the Federal Salary Council, praised the inclusion of pay parity, but commented that the raise is "very low," and said she would explore opportunities for increasing it legislatively.

Also on Monday, the Office of Personnel Management released the 2009 Pay Agent Report, which outlined the locality pay formulas for 2011. The report shows an average pay disparity of 22 percent between federal pay and nonfederal pay in comparable occupations and areas. As in previous years, the report, however, does not recommend following the locality pay formula outlined in the 1990 Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.