Remember the Veterans Health Care Crisis?

Men sit outside the Raymond G. Murphy VA Medical Center in Albuquerque, N.M., Thursday, July 3, 2014. Men sit outside the Raymond G. Murphy VA Medical Center in Albuquerque, N.M., Thursday, July 3, 2014. Russell Contreras/AP

Having so far failed to complete reform legislation intended to ensure veterans don't die waiting for health care, lawmakers return facing significant unfinished business to show voters action before they go home to campaign in August.

The House and Senate are under the gun to show a response to reports that veterans have been left languishing for months on secret waiting lists for medical treatment, or never even getting onto such lists. Veterans are a popular constituency that neither party can afford to ignore, so the pressure is on to deliver something lawmakers can campaign on, before election season heats up.

But members serving on a joint House and Senate conference committee, tasked with hashing out veterans reform legislation, made little headway before recess.

The 28 committee members agreed they are committed to a bipartisan solution that will make it easier for veterans to receive the care they deserve. But several—particularly Republicans—remain hung up over concerns about estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that the reforms could cost as much as $50 billion a year.

The legislation would make it easier to remove incompetent Veterans Affairs Department leaders. It also aims to ensure veterans receive more timely care, including by letting veterans who live more than 40 miles from a VA health center seek care from private providers.

But lawmakers largely do not want to be seen doubling the government's cost of VA health care to achieve this goal.

Before recess, at the only public meeting of the conference committee, Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., who serves as the ranking member on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, blasted the CBO numbers, calling the agency's assumptions "ludicrous" and challenging it to back them up.

Since then members and staff have met behind closed doors with CBO officials, asking for a justification of its assumptions. CBO has argued that because the legislation aims to improve access to VA health care and minimize wait times, veterans are likely to increase the amount of care they receive from the VA. And veterans who do not currently rely on the VA are also more likely to enroll in it and seek out this benefit.

Currently about 8 million of roughly 21 million veterans are enrolled in VA health care; of those, about 6. 5 million take advantage of it. CBO estimated that another 8 million eligible veterans might seek access to VA health care because of the improvements to its access that would be made through the legislation.

But some conference committee members are balking, challenging these predictions. They are asking CBO and the VA to come up with new estimates of what the legislation would cost if additional restrictions or limitations were placed on the expanded access to health care in a final bill.

"The first order of business is for VA and CBO to produce information regarding certain costs and considerations associated with possible reform permutations," said a congressional aide familiar with the negotiations.

No additional formal meetings of the full roster of conferees have been set, but individual members and staff continue to discuss ways to whittle down the projected costs of the reform.

Lawmakers say they are committed to hashing out a compromise bill and getting it through both chambers and to the president's desk as quickly as possible. But sources tracking the negotiations argue the cost wrinkles could take a while to iron out, making the August recess the next big deadline for completion.

"What needs to happen is the conferees need to agree upon the size and scope and cost … as well as some of the other initiatives in the bill," said Robert Norton, a deputy director of government relations with the Military Officers Association of America. "Our biggest concern is that they need to get it done. They need to make sure that veterans get access and are not stuck on these waiting lists for months on end."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    View
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.