The Perfect Obamacare Horror Story Remains Elusive

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Stephan Savoia/AP

Obamacare definitely has winners and losers, but for some reason Republicans have trouble finding the losers. Glenn Kessler at The Washington Post walked through two more would be horror stories in Wednesday's fact checker: Sen. Rand Paul argued that for every one Obamacare enrollment in his state, 40 plans were cancelled, and a Nebraska woman worried that her premiums would go up (they didn't). Despite raising legitimate concerns some people have had — cancelled policies and higher premiums, often for more comprehensive insurance — Republicans still struggle to find people who have actually been inconvenienced.

In his May 2 newsletter, Rand Paul asked people to share their Obamacare stories, noting that "for every Kentuckian who has enrolled in Obamacare, 40 have been dropped from their coverage." Politifact rated this lie "pants on fire," since the 82,795 people enrolled in private plans and 330,615 enrolled in Medicaid. It's estimated that 130,000 to 168,000 plans were cancelled, though many of those individuals were re-enrolled into new plans.

Acknowledging that not everyone enrolled in Medicaid because of Obamacare (they might have already been eligible), Paul's 40-to-1 ratio is still absurd. Paul's spokesman Brian Darling told the Post that the figure was outdated: it compared 7,000 private plan enrollees as of November 2013 to 280,000 private and small group plan cancellations. Given that, by some estimates, Obamacare cut Kentucky's uninsured level by 40 percent, Kentucky might not be the best place to look for horror stories.

And apparently Nebraska isn't too great either — mother of two Andrea Kodad appeared in an ad for Republican Rep. Lee Terry and said her premium would rise about $300 because of Obamacare. As it turns out, the administration's Keep Your Plan fix applied to her. A Terry spokesperson told the Post that that was her reality at the time, and “Obamacare is creating that kind of uncertainty." Uncertainty is another big concern detractors of the law have pointed to. For instance, Julie Boonstra, a Michigan woman with cancer, appeared in Americans for Prosperity ads in March arguing that her new out of pocket costs were "unaffordable" because they were less predictable. Of course, she was saving $1,200 a year

More often than not, the most prominent Obamacare horror stories end with the star being, at least in some ways, better off than before. The "Obamacare raped my future" woman who actually qualified for Medicaid and the woman whose premium went up 994 percent, until you acknowledged that her old plan covered next to nothing and she was eligible for subsidies, both stand out as strong examples. The stories fall apart under the slightest scrutiny.

Meanwhile, efforts to seek out horror stories haven't always ended well. Florida Gov. Rick Scott couldn't find any senior citizens who'd been significantly affected by the health care law's Medicare Advantage cuts. Senate hopeful Scott Brown ran into a Republican Obamacare success story while disparaging Obamacare. It's not that there aren't people out there who have been negatively affected by the law, but Obamacare's staunchest opponents are having a hard time finding them.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.