Republicans Want Lawmakers, Staff to Foot Obamacare Bill

Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., is sponsoring a bill that would prohibit the government from contributing to the premium costs of health care plans covering members of Congress and congressional staff. Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., is sponsoring a bill that would prohibit the government from contributing to the premium costs of health care plans covering members of Congress and congressional staff. Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Lawmakers and congressional staff would have to pay for their health care without government help under legislation introduced this week.

Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., is sponsoring a bill (H.R. 3066) that would prohibit the government from contributing to the premium costs of health care plans covering members of Congress and congressional staff, including committee and leadership aides. Most lawmakers and congressional staff have to drop their health insurance coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program soon and enter the exchange market as part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act.

The Office of Personnel Management issued draft guidance last month that said the federal government would continue to help subsidize legislative branch employees’ health plans under Obamacare. Affected lawmakers and congressional staff still have to enter the exchanges beginning Oct. 1 per the law, but, like private sector employees, they would not lose their employer contributions for these health plans, the Obama administration said. FEHBP currently pays up to 75 percent of the health care program’s premium costs.

Several House and Senate Republicans are upset about the administration’s decision, arguing that Capitol Hill should not receive a special exemption under a law Congress created.

“Without legal authority, President Obama plans to give subsidies to political insiders that aren’t available to any other American,” Cotton said in a statement about his bill, dubbed the 2013 No Special Deal for D.C. Insiders Act. Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., also introduced a bill that would eliminate the government’s employer contribution to the health care plans of lawmakers and staff, according to a report in The Hill. Sens. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., and David Vitter, R-La., are leading a similar effort in the Senate.

But Congress is a large employer, and many worry that the shift from FEHBP to the health care insurance exchanges under Obamacare without a government contribution would be too expensive for many aides and lawmakers, making it difficult to retain employees. OPM’s proposed rule stipulates that those affected congressional employees and lawmakers would not qualify for premium tax credits under the Affordable Care Act.

Another bill (H.R. 3067) circulating in the House, sponsored by Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., would strip the government subsidy of health care premiums for lawmakers only, and would not affect congressional staff.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.