Acting IRS Chief Touts Progress in Reforming Exempt Organizations Processes

Acting IRS chief Danny Werfel described progress in implementing 60 “action items” based on nine recommendations made this May by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. Acting IRS chief Danny Werfel described progress in implementing 60 “action items” based on nine recommendations made this May by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. J. Scott Applewhite/AP file photo

Since taking over in May as acting chief of the Internal Revenue Service, Danny Werfel has presided over “a period of aggressive activity” that includes fresh leadership and promising policy reforms to ease the troubled agency forward from this spring’s scandal over alleged political targeting of conservative nonprofits.

Testifying Wednesday at a Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee hearing, Werfel described progress in implementing 60 “action items” based on nine recommendations made this May by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

He also clashed with Republicans who are angry that he has not fired Lois Lerner, the former head of the IRS Exempt Organizations division now on administrative leave. Lerner’s May decision to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid testifying on what went wrong has made her the central figure in the IRS controversy.

Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Charles Boustany Jr., R-La., convened the hearing saying, “There are many questions outstanding” and “the IRS faces a long road to recover its reputation.” He said his subcommittee’s review of the 298 original applications for tax-exempt status showed that “83 percent were right leaning and 29 or 10 percent were left leaning. Of the right leaning groups, only 45 percent have been approved, while 70 percent of the left leaning groups have been approved.” He also cited numbers showing that right-leaning organizations were more likely to be subjected to IRS “surveillance” and that “the consequence of being in the program is that surveillance can lead to an audit.”

Ranking Member Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., though agreeing that the IRS tax exempt organizations unit needed reforms, said, “Unfortunately, my friends on the other side of the aisle continue to frame this issue as a partisan one -- as only affecting conservative groups. Time and time again the facts have shown that both Republican-leaning and Democratic-leaning groups were singled out during the application process. We know why we are here today -- for Republicans to distract us from their lack of a positive legislative agenda to improve the economy, create jobs and fund the government.”

Werfel praised his team of new leaders from outside and from within the IRS, and described reforms to the applications screening process. “We have suspended the [Be on the Lookout] lists, and everything is based on an organization’s activities, not on names or labels,” he said.

In addition, there are new checks and balances, enhanced training, and a new “Review of Operations” process for determining how much scrutiny an application should receive. The process includes a committee that votes on problematic cases, a requirement for a manager’s approval before an employee can contact a taxpayer applicant for further information, and an expanded appeals process. “We’re working toward more standardized language that takes some of the subjectivity out of it, that, after getting feedback from Congress, we hope to incorporate into the IRS manual,” Werfel said.

An accelerated process has allowed the Exempt Organizations unit to close 91 of the outstanding 131 cases, of which 70 were approved, 36 of them self-certified, Werfel said. An application backlog of some 65,000 remains. Werfel said there is a “discrepancy” between his numbers and those invoked by the Republicans, but said the differences could be worked out. Acting Exempt Organizations Chief Ken Corbin, he said, has sent many of those applications in question back to the IRS office in Dallas, so the whole process has been “re-baselined.”

IRS has also turned over 390,000 pages of documents to congressional investigators, Werfel reported. “There have been changes from soup to nuts, and we really are re-engineering the process-- it’s exciting,” he said. “We still have a great deal of work to do.”

Under questioning from Democrats, Werfel said he had not seen any evidence of political motivation in past processing of the applications.

Rep. Marcia Black, R-Tenn., asked whether the IRS retains donor lists that she said were unlawfully obtained from certain applicants -- 24 of 27 of them were right-leaning, she said.

Several lawmakers raised questions about recent emails from Lerner containing cryptic comments about Tea Party groups and the Federal Election Commission. Werfel agreed that certain messages “raised questions” but declined to speculate on their meaning.

Angry retorts came from Reps. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., and Tom Reed, R-N.Y., who demanded to know why Lerner hasn’t been fired. Kelly produced a letter on IRS letterhead that the IRS had turned over to Congress that still contained Lerner’s signature despite her being on administrative leave. “In Washington, accountability means putting people in another agency and never holding anyone accountable for wrongdoing,” Kelly said.

Werfel said the Privacy Act prevents him from addressing her case directly. “There is a process,” he said.

After Reed threatened Werfel with criminal charges unless he answered, Werfel consulted his staff and promised to seek legal advice to see whether he is permitted to provide Congress with an answer.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.