Top DHS Auditor Had Employees Write His Dissertation, Fired Dissidents, Complaints Allege

Department of Homeland Security's Deputy Inspector General Charles Edwards Department of Homeland Security's Deputy Inspector General Charles Edwards Charles Dharapak/AP

A Senate subcommittee is investigating a high-ranking auditor after receiving complaints of nepotism, abuse of power and involvement in cover-ups.

Sens. Clare McCaskill, D-Mo., and Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., chairwoman and ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs’ Financial and Contracting Oversight Subcommittee, sent a letter on Thursday to Charles Edwards, the deputy inspector general at the Homeland Security Department, asking for his cooperation in the investigation. With the DHS IG role currently vacant, Edwards is serving as the head of the auditor’s office.

Edwards allegedly helped his wife, Madhuri Edwards, secure the position of supervisory auditor within his office, a move that “appears to violate laws and regulations governing prohibited personnel practices,” the letter said. The subcommittee also received complaints Edwards took retaliatory action against an employee who attempted to call attention to the misconduct.

The head of the IG’s office also allegedly played a role in in covering up “relevant and damaging information” in the investigation into the Secret Service’s encounters with Colombian prostitutes, the letter said.  The senators outlined allegations that Edwards is “susceptible to political pressure,” saying whistleblowers claimed he “intentionally changed and withheld information” in both internal documents and the public report.

Edwards allegedly required his employees to drive him and his wife around on “personal errands,” helped his wife secure improper benefits and falsely claimed to make “site visits” to an IG office in Florida in order to attend classes for his Ph.D -- all on the taxpayers’ dime. Whistleblowers accused Edwards of requiring his staff to do his schoolwork and write his dissertation paper. Edwards allegedly offered bonuses to staffers who assisted him with his Ph.D work.

The senators received complaints that Edwards asked his staff to “complete lesson plans and compile homework assignments” for a class he taught at Capitol College in Laurel, Md., as an adjunct professor.

Employees who refused or questioned Edwards faced penalties, whistleblowers said. Edwards allegedly placed these workers on administrative leave or fired them and assisted adverse actions against personnel with grievances. He also “improperly interfered” with the reinstatement of one former employee’s security clearance, complaints alleged.

The Senate subcommittee has asked Edwards for a variety of documents and communications, including emails and documents related to “official trips” made to Florida, employment at Capitol College, awards and bonuses for his employees, and all complaints he received. Lawmakers also asked him to make certain staff would be available for interviews.

A spokesman in the IG’s office told Government Executive, “DHS OIG plans to comply fully with the Senators’ requests,” but declined to comment further on the specifics of the claims.  

The Senators -- who were “alerted by numerous whistleblowers” over the last year of the misconduct -- asked for a response by July 13.

Edwards was named acting inspector general in February 2011 and has remained the head of the office since he resumed his position as deputy IG in January 2013.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.