Biden deficit group gives itself July 1 deadline

Six lawmakers led by Vice President Joe Biden and charged with developing a deficit-reduction plan met for the third time this week and agreed on Thursday to give themselves until July 1 to come up with an agreement or decide not to continue. Whether or not to raise taxes remained a key sticking point.

"The idea is that we would either reach an agreement in principle by then or recognize that we are not able to bridge our differences," House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., a member of the group, said on his way out of the meeting.

While few observers believe the negotiators can cut a deal by July 1, the talks are ramping up with the clear intention at making progress before then.

Biden said staff will be working "around the clock" next week.

He also said Democrats have made it clear they will consider GOP-favored cuts if Republicans will agree to some revenue increases. If Republicans can agree on revenue, a priority for Democrats, he said, "We are prepared to agree to some of the things you want in discretionary spending."

The group appears to have agreed on noncontroversial parts of the budget, but those parts are contingent on agreement on more divisive areas, Van Hollen and Biden said.

The group is set to meet three times again next week, but for three hours instead of two. And Biden said the group might meet four times. The deficit-reduction plan is needed in order to win enough congressional support to raise the debt ceiling by August 2, when the Treasury Department said it would exhaust its borrowing authority.

Republicans and Democrats remain at odds over including taxes in the plan. Republicans oppose raising taxes as a way to reduce the deficit and are more focused on limiting spending. But Democrats, who are in agreement on including spending cuts, also want tax increases, like closing special-interest tax loopholes, to be part of a deficit-reduction package.

Van Hollen said the focus of Thursday's meeting was non-health mandatory programs, such as farm subsidies.

"Today we spent a lot of time refining ideas for saving funds; it wasn't necessarily a huge amount of dollar savings on every one thing, but the details are important when you are making policy changes," Van Hollen said. "We have a long way to go here before we resolve the toughest issues."

Van Hollen added: "We've made progress on [looking for savings in non-health mandatory programs], but any progress on that is contingent on resolving other issues down the road."

Biden said there are differences that are going to "be bridged, it won't occur until the end." He said negotiators "have gone through all the discrete elements of the budget and we've said 'OK if we have an agreement on everything, we agree on this piece.' "

"The really tough stuff are the big ticket items, and philosophically big-ticket items," Biden added, citing as an example health care-related spending. "If we can get an agreement on military, we are prepared to do more."

He said both sides are informing the other of the political issues they face. "We understand Republican pressures," Biden said. "They understand Democratic pressures."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.