Senate Democrats approve budget on partisan vote

Split down party lines, the Senate Budget Committee Thursday moved its fiscal 2009 budget plan to the floor after staving off Republican efforts to rewrite key elements of the process.

By a 12-10 margin, the 23-member panel voted to approve a $3 trillion blueprint that would set the spending and taxing policies for fiscal 2009.

President Bush has said he will veto any fiscal 2009 appropriations bills that exceed his overall spending target and do not cut the number and cost of earmarks in half from fiscal 2008.

Democrats would restore spending cuts in Bush's proposed budget for a host of domestic programs, ranging from children's health care and veterans' benefits to education and climate change programs, as well as local law enforcement assistance. They also assume the expiration in 2010 of Bush's tax cuts in order to free up more revenue for their spending priorities.

The Republicans, citing their interest in restricting the reach and growth of government, largely support the president's priorities and favor the tax cuts as a way to enforce spending discipline.

The Senate's resolution, which is scheduled for a long debate next week, follows earlier approval of a similar budget plan by the House Budget Committee.

Although the two resolutions largely track on spending and taxing issues, there are some significant differences that could protract negotiations in a conference committee.

Both measures call for a one-year patch of the alternative minimum tax that could block its bite this tax year on about 20 million taxpayers.

But the House would require offsets, under budget reconciliation procedures, to cover the loss of revenue. The Senate committee's resolution does not contain reconciliation instructions.

Also, the Senate calls for extending several expiring middle-class tax breaks, worth $300 billion, that would be paid for by hoped-for budget surpluses in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013. The House measure favors those tax breaks but assumes they will be offset by other taxes or by spending cuts.

Finally, the Senate resolution calls for a standby $35 billion auxiliary stimulus package to be created if the economy continues to stumble. The House plan has no such provision.

In delivering their proposal to the floor, the committee's Democrats fended off attempts by Republicans to alter the long-standing rules that safeguard budget resolutions from crippling filibusters and that require new spending or taxes to be offset by other revenues or spending cuts.

Senate Finance ranking member Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, proposed an amendment to exempt the AMT from pay/go rules, which was rejected 12-10 along party lines.

Budget ranking member Judd Gregg, R-N.H., offered an amendment that would effectively vitiate the scope of budget reconciliation and thus subject the resolution to the threat of filibuster. That proposal went down, again on party lines, 12-10.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., also failed in an attempt to shield Bush's expiring tax cuts, if extended, from pay/go rules. That one fell on a 12-11 vote.

And the committee also rejected, by 12-11 votes, an amendment by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, to strike the Senate's ability to waive the pay/go rule with a 60-vote majority, and another from Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, to use any revenue collecting from closing the "tax gap" to reduce the national debt.

But not all votes split along party lines.

By a 13-10 margin, the committee voted to limit commodity payments to farmers to $250,000 a year and by 14-8 to reject Gregg's amendment to remove milk subsidies inserted into the fiscal 2008 budget resolution without offsets from this year's resolution.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.