GAO cites cost, schedule risks in IT projects supporting census

Information technology projects that support the decennial 2010 census are over budget and behind schedule, according to a report released last week by the Government Accountability Office.

The Census Bureau is developing four IT projects to support the census, but three are either behind schedule or over budget, GAO concluded. The one that poses the biggest threat is the Field Data Collection Automation (FDCA) project, under which the bureau will outfit 525,000 enumerators with handheld computers loaded with Global Positioning System software to survey individual households that do not return census forms.

The high-risk project is more than $18 million over budget and has had delays in system development and testing of interfaces, according to the GAO report (GAO-08-79), which attributes most of the cost overrun to an increase in system requirements. The original cost of FDCA was $600 million.

The Decennial Response Integration System (DRIS), which will collect and integrate census information from various sources, also is behind schedule, according to GAO. DRIS is on budget but is expected to deliver reduced functionality for the April 2008 dress rehearsal, in which the bureau will test all equipment and business processes needed to carry out the census. More testing may be required later in the process.

A third project, called Data Access and Dissemination System II (DADS II), is also behind schedule. The Census Bureau originally planned to award a contract in 2005, but just awarded it in September.

A fourth IT project, under which the bureau plans to modernize its database for address lists and maps, is on schedule and on budget, GAO reported.

Any problems in developing the IT projects threaten to delay the Census Bureau's 2008 dress rehearsal, when the bureau identifies any corrections it may have to make before initiating the census in April 2010.

"Delays in functionality mean that the dress rehearsal operational testing will take place without the full complement of systems and functionality that was originally planned," according to GAO. "However, bureau officials have not finalized their plans for testing all the systems. . . . Without sufficient testing of all systems and their functionality, the bureau increases the risk that costs will increase further, that decennial systems will not perform as expected, or both."

Another concern is the lack of a large-scale risk management plan, especially given the closely related nature of the various IT systems, said Bob Charette, a risk management consultant and president of Itabhi Corp.

"This is a case of reactive risk management," Charette said. "There is no hierarchy or system-level risk management process that handles everything. It is still a very fragmented approach. It is unclear to me who owns the risk at the total system level, and it appears to me that they are not too far away from approaching crisis-management mode. Because of the compressed schedules, if there is any major hiccup in this rollout, they don't have a lot of extra slack they can use."

GAO called for extensive end-to-end testing of all systems under the direction of the Census Bureau director. GAO also suggested the bureau create a list of potential risks, along with mitigation strategies for the most significant of those risks. And auditors recommended that the bureau hold regular risk briefings with senior executives.

The Census Bureau has said that it plans to test all systems on dress rehearsal day or soon after.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.