Why Obama Is Saying 'Torture' Matters

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Friday wasn't the first time President Obama used the word "torture" to describe the "enhanced interrogation techniques" used by the Central Intelligence Agency against terrorism suspects, but this time might be the most meaningful.

Obama's remarks came at the end of an impromptu session with reporters in the White House briefing room. Asked about a classified Senate report that delved into CIA actions during the Bush administration, the president responded by saying the report concluded that in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, "we did some things that were wrong. We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tortured some folks. We did some things that were contrary to our values."

Obama made similar remarks last year in a speech at the National Defense University—and, as far back as 2009, he referred to "waterboarding" as torture. But it carries greater weight now, with the expectation that portions of the Senate report will be declassified in the coming days at the urging of the White House.

That report, which chronicles a series of CIA abuses, does not use the word "torture" to characterize excessive interrogation practices, according to The Daily Beast. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which conducted the probe has said its findings will reveal abuse that is "chilling" and "systematic and widespread." The report is also expected to conclude that the enhanced techniques were not effective in yielding useful intelligence.

"Torture" and the connotations it carries has been a loaded word politically since George W. Bush's first term. And Obama's decision to use it immediately sparked outrage from conservatives on Twitter. (Obama was also criticized for using the colloquial "folks" to describe those interrogated.)

But it appears to have been a choice by the president to cast the CIA's practices in the most brutal terms in order to make his condemnation of them as powerful as possible, sending a signal both at home and abroad that such practices are no longer sanctioned. That way, when the report does become public, Obama's words Friday will still be echoing. At the same time, it likely will do little to mollify critics who say his administration has failed to hold CIA agents who conducted the interrogations legally accountable.

Obama also used the occasion to support CIA Director John Brennan, who apologized this week to lawmakers after an internal probe found that CIA agents had broken into computers used by the Senate Intelligence Committee. At least one member of that committee, Mark Udall of Colorado, has called for Brennan to resign. But the president seemed to put that matter to rest, for now. "I have full confidence in John Brennan," Obama said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.