A Breakthrough in Federal Labor-Management Relations at the Pentagon?

Defense Department file photo

The latest overhaul of the Defense Department civilian personnel system has been an “unprecedented" landmark in labor-management collaboration, according to one union involved in the negotiations.

Pete Randazzo and Paul O’Connor, who represent the National Federation of Federal Employees, celebrated the process of replacing the failed National Security Personnel System created during the George W. Bush administration. The union officials corroborated the Pentagon’s side of the story, which another union previously called a complete fabrication.

“For the most part it has been collaborative, inclusive and genuine with open communication,” Randazzo told Government Executive.

Defense has boasted its engagement with employees, labor groups and other stakeholders in determining how to best reform the way it evaluates and compensates its civilian employees. In an interview with Government Executive last month, an American Federation of Government Employees official took issue with those claims, saying his union was largely boxed out of the process.

NFFE, however, said design teams made up of labor and management representatives arrived at recommendations for the Pentagon  after a “highly interactive” process. That process, which was completed in December 2011, yielded 99 suggestions, 88 of which the Pentagon ultimately adopted.

As the process has moved toward implementing those recommendations, there have been some communication gaps, Randazzo said. Still, the partnership enabled the Pentagon to hear “perspectives they never would have heard before,” he said.   

“We’re still working together,” O’Connor said. “There’s such diversity of ideas. It’s really interesting to hear other folks’ perspectives.”

The pair hoped the spirit of collaboration between supervisors and rank-and-file employees would be adopted into the new system.

Department managers “were villains at first,” Randazzo said. “Really they were more of the victim. We weren’t equipping them to be successful.”

To that end, a Pentagon spokesman said the new system will better connect performance expectations to departmentwide goals, and boost communication between employees and the supervisors rating them. When Congress repealed NSPS in 2010, it explicitly said the replacement system -- which does not yet have an implementation date -- should reward the best employees with not just monetary bonuses but access to more training and development opportunities.

The new personnel management structure will establish a three-tier performance appraisal system for the vast majority of the Defense Department’s 750,000 civilian employees.   

Regardless of the final configuration of the system, Randazzo said he hoped the redesign process will be used as a prototype in the future.

“It will probably be used in the Harvard business model,” he said. “It was that unprecedented.” 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.