A Breakthrough in Federal Labor-Management Relations at the Pentagon?

Defense Department file photo

The latest overhaul of the Defense Department civilian personnel system has been an “unprecedented" landmark in labor-management collaboration, according to one union involved in the negotiations.

Pete Randazzo and Paul O’Connor, who represent the National Federation of Federal Employees, celebrated the process of replacing the failed National Security Personnel System created during the George W. Bush administration. The union officials corroborated the Pentagon’s side of the story, which another union previously called a complete fabrication.

“For the most part it has been collaborative, inclusive and genuine with open communication,” Randazzo told Government Executive.

Defense has boasted its engagement with employees, labor groups and other stakeholders in determining how to best reform the way it evaluates and compensates its civilian employees. In an interview with Government Executive last month, an American Federation of Government Employees official took issue with those claims, saying his union was largely boxed out of the process.

NFFE, however, said design teams made up of labor and management representatives arrived at recommendations for the Pentagon  after a “highly interactive” process. That process, which was completed in December 2011, yielded 99 suggestions, 88 of which the Pentagon ultimately adopted.

As the process has moved toward implementing those recommendations, there have been some communication gaps, Randazzo said. Still, the partnership enabled the Pentagon to hear “perspectives they never would have heard before,” he said.   

“We’re still working together,” O’Connor said. “There’s such diversity of ideas. It’s really interesting to hear other folks’ perspectives.”

The pair hoped the spirit of collaboration between supervisors and rank-and-file employees would be adopted into the new system.

Department managers “were villains at first,” Randazzo said. “Really they were more of the victim. We weren’t equipping them to be successful.”

To that end, a Pentagon spokesman said the new system will better connect performance expectations to departmentwide goals, and boost communication between employees and the supervisors rating them. When Congress repealed NSPS in 2010, it explicitly said the replacement system -- which does not yet have an implementation date -- should reward the best employees with not just monetary bonuses but access to more training and development opportunities.

The new personnel management structure will establish a three-tier performance appraisal system for the vast majority of the Defense Department’s 750,000 civilian employees.   

Regardless of the final configuration of the system, Randazzo said he hoped the redesign process will be used as a prototype in the future.

“It will probably be used in the Harvard business model,” he said. “It was that unprecedented.” 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.