Uncertainty Surrounding the Sequester Made a Measurable Difference Even on the Local Level


Not all the effects of sequestration are quantifiable, but concrete impacts on agencies in fiscal 2013 ranged from skipped medical facility inspections, to lengthier border crossings for truckers, to delayed housing vouchers for the needy, to postponed training for nondeployed military units, Congress’ watchdog reported.

The Government Accountability Office, in a report released on Wednesday to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., summarized the sequester’s impact on six program areas selected for variety. “These case studies illustrate how some spending reductions at the federal level ultimately reduced funding for program partners operating at the local level,” GAO wrote.

The studies “provide further evidence that the uncertainty surrounding the timing and amount of sequestration hampered communication with program partners and recipients,” the report said. 

Auditors reviewed programs within the Defense, Housing and Urban Development, Homeland Security, Education, and Health and Human Services departments. They found negative effects on military operations and maintenance, larger elementary school classroom sizes, reduced frequency of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services health care quality surveys, longer wait times for Customs and Border Protection inspections and reduced rental assistance in HUD’s Public and Indian Housing Office.

More specifically, GAO noted a 2.2 percent reduction in the number of very low income households that received rental assistance under the Public and Indian Housing Office between 2012 and 2013. Average wait times for international passengers traveling through CBP inspection booths increased from 19.7 minutes in fiscal 2012 to 22.8 minutes in fiscal 2013 at one airport and from 20.9 minutes to 26.8 minutes at another -- because CBP lacked overtime funds.

GAO reviewed evidence and supporting documents to “assess the reasonableness of components’ estimates of the effects of sequestration on operations, performance and services to the public.”

Some agencies had more discretion in protecting “higher priority activities” by identifying flexibilities or modifying or canceling contracts or other ongoing activities, auditors found. For example the Pentagon postponed training for units not scheduled to deploy in 2014.

But in programs such as HUD’s Housing Choice Vouchers and Education’s Title I, both based on eligibility, GAO wrote, “program partners had to identify specific actions -- such as limiting the number of housing vouchers issued and increasing classroom size -- to absorb the reductions and mitigate their effects on the public.”

(Image via hxdbzxy/Shutterstock.com)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.