Senate Panel Advances More Legislation Targeting VA Executives

“VA personnel should be accountable for their actions; otherwise the current system of mediocrity and failure will remain,” Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., said. “VA personnel should be accountable for their actions; otherwise the current system of mediocrity and failure will remain,” Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., said. Associated Press

A Senate panel on Thursday approved a Veterans Affairs Department spending bill that targets senior executives in response to the recent scandals that have engulfed the agency.

The Senate Appropriations Committee’s Military Construction and VA fiscal 2015 funding measure would place a temporary ban on bonuses for some agency doctors and executives. The committee also accepted an amendment to include the House-backed bill that would ease the firing of senior executives at the agency.

The appropriations bill, which provides $165.4 billion in funding for VA and military construction for fiscal 2015, was approved unanimously and now heads to the full Senate.

“At a time when the VA is being rocked by turmoil over allegations of secret wait lists at hospitals, on top of ongoing challenges to eliminate the claims processing backlog, Congress must move quickly to provide the leadership, resources, oversight and accountability needed to assure that veterans are receiving the timely and quality health care and benefits they deserve,” said Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., chairman of the  VA  appropriations subcommittee.

The bonus provision would prohibit performance awards for Veterans Health Administration medical directors, assistant medical directors and Seniors Executive Service employees until the agency’s inspector general has completed its investigation into extended wait times and cover ups at VA facilities and “reforms have been implemented.” The bill would provide the inspector general $5 million more than President Obama’s request and the 2014 level, in part to ensure it has the resources to conduct the investigation.

The House in April approved its VA spending bill, which included a provision to prohibit bonuses for all VA senior executives in fiscal 2015. On Wednesday, the House easily passed the VA Management Accountability Act, which would give Secretary Eric Shinseki enhanced authority to terminate or demote senior executives at the agency.

Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., introduced the same bill -- which federal employee advocates have derided as an unconstitutional political gambit that will ultimately drive qualified professionals away from the VA -- as an amendment to the spending bill.

“VA personnel should be accountable for their actions; otherwise the current system of mediocrity and failure will remain,” Moran said. “This amendment will help make certain that those who violate VA policy and affect the quality of medical care veterans receive are held responsible.”

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., spoke out against the bill, saying it may end up doing “more harm than good.”

“We want to make sure we have quality people in the hospitals and I’m sure this gets to that,” Tester said. The amendment, however, was adopted unanimously by voice vote.

Carol Bonosaro, president of Senior Executives Association, had sent a letter on Wednesday urging the committee not to approve the bonus prohibition, and said in a statement, “It makes no sense to punish all for the alleged misdeeds of the very few.” 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.