Senate Panel Exposes Fraud in Social Security Disability Program

Sen. Tom Corburn, R-Okla. Sen. Tom Corburn, R-Okla. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP File Photo

The Huntington, W.Va., office of the Social Security Administration became the center of a multi-million-dollar, multi-year fraud scheme in which lawyers, administrative judges and doctors profited from the agency’s efforts to accelerate its disability claims processing, according to a report released Monday based on a two-year Senate staff investigation.

Following a preview on Sunday night’s “60 Minutes,” the bipartisan report, titled “How Some Legal, Medical, and Judicial Professionals Abused Social Security Disability Programs for the Country’s Most Vulnerable,” was unveiled just before a Monday hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, at which the SSA and Congress were blasted for poor oversight and for allowing a short-circuiting of quality-control in evaluating claims in disability programs that last year paid out $137 billion to 11 million Americans.

The report describes how the Social Security Administration under Commissioner Michael Astrue pressured administrative law judges to decide a high volume of cases, and in doing so, “failed to ensure they produced quality decisions.”

“Congress has acted as if getting more people on the program is more important than conducting oversight,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., who led the staff probe along with Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich. “With the clock ticking on the Social Security trust fund, the people who are truly disabled pay the price.”

Coburn described particulars of how a Kentucky-based lawyer named Eric C. Conn became the country’s third highest-earning disability collection attorney through a scheme allegedly involving administrative law judges David Doherty and Charlie Andrus and a set of friendly doctors. They communicated using disposable cellphones, Coburn said, and emails that have since disappeared, to process hundreds of cases quickly without hearings and with only perfunctory medical exams, nearly all resulting in approvals for applicants and profits for the law firm.

The fraud was brought to light by employees of both SSA and the Conn law firm, some of whom were later subject to whistleblower retaliation, Coburn noted. Several of the whistleblowers appeared on “60 Minutes” and testified at Monday’s hearing. SSA executives scheduled to testify had to postpone because of the government shutdown, noted committee Chairman Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del.

The lesson, Coburn said, is that Congress must reform its oversight of SSA and task the agency with better monitoring of administrative law judges.

Levin told the hearing that Judge Doherty was placed on leave in 2011 and then retired, while Andrus last month was placed on administrative leave pending a review. “But Eric Conn is still going strong, reaping millions of dollars in attorneys’ fees, and just opened a new office in Beverly Hills, with no accountability for his actions,” Levin said.

Levin added that the report didn’t reach a conclusion as to how many of the suspect cases were decided wrongly. “This investigation is not intended to denigrate those on disability,” he said. “It was launched because some of SSA’s hard-working employees blew the whistle. The disability program plays a critical role in the lives of many Americans.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.