GAO Gets Tough on Obama Implementation of Performance Act

Evan Vucci/AP

Though the Obama administration has made progress implementing the 2010 update to the central federal management performance law, agency managers continue to face obstacles in measuring improvements and the Office of Management and Budget has delayed issuing needed guidance, a new audit found.

The Government Accountability Office’s 83-page progress report on the 2010 Government Results and Performance Modernization Act gave agencies credit for pursuing cross-agency goals, establishing performance leadership objectives and maintaining the website, which provides quarterly updates on activity within and across agencies.

But “the executive branch needs to do more to fully implement and leverage the act’s provisions to address governance challenges,” the auditors said. “OMB and agencies have identified many programs and activities that contribute to goals, as required, but are missing additional opportunities to address crosscutting issues,” which are especially important in an era of budget austerity.

The chief example auditors gave is the need to identify tax expenditures, or tax code provisions that benefit taxpayers who meet specified criteria. Such provisions represented about $1 trillion in forgone revenue in fiscal 2012, “due to a lack of OMB guidance and oversight,” the auditors said.

Additionally, the survey of managers governmentwide found “too little improvement in managers’ reported use of performance information or practices that could help promote this use,” the report said. “There was a decline in the percentage of managers that agreed that their agencies’ top leadership demonstrates a strong commitment to achieving results.” And despite agency efforts to align daily operations with agency results, agencies continue to face long-standing issues with measuring performance across various programs and activities, an issue that should be addressed by the interagency Performance Improvement Council, the auditors recommended.

The report also suggested improved communication with stakeholders and stronger efforts to convert data into formats usable by lawmakers and their staff when they make decisions.

Executive branch responses to the report’s specific recommendations are pending.

The required report is based on agency manager surveys from August 2012 to June 2013, according to a letter from J. Christopher Mihm, GAO’s managing director of strategic issues, to Sens. Tom Carper, D-Del., chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and Mark Warner, D-Va., leader of a special Senate Budget Committee performance task force, and Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

OMB’s performance functions are being handled on an acting basis by Dustin Brown, deputy assistant director for management. Jeffrey Zients, chief performance officer and acting budget director during Obama’s first term, left the White House in May, followed by Shelley Metzenbaum, OMB’s associate director for performance and personnel management, who is now directing a new government reform group led by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.